mirror of
https://github.com/qodo-ai/pr-agent.git
synced 2025-07-10 15:50:37 +08:00
Compare commits
2 Commits
main
...
mrT23-patc
Author | SHA1 | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
4f049ab586 | |||
0672189412 |
59
README.md
59
README.md
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
<div align="center">
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<div align="center">
|
||||
|
||||
@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ PR-Agent aims to help efficiently review and handle pull requests, by providing
|
||||
[](https://github.com/apps/qodo-merge-pro/)
|
||||
[](https://github.com/apps/qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source/)
|
||||
[](https://discord.com/invite/SgSxuQ65GF)
|
||||
<!-- TODO: add badge also for twitter -->
|
||||
<a href="https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/commits/main">
|
||||
<img alt="GitHub" src="https://img.shields.io/github/last-commit/Codium-ai/pr-agent/main?style=for-the-badge" height="20">
|
||||
</a>
|
||||
@ -31,12 +32,12 @@ PR-Agent aims to help efficiently review and handle pull requests, by providing
|
||||
|
||||
- [Getting Started](#getting-started)
|
||||
- [News and Updates](#news-and-updates)
|
||||
- [Why Use PR-Agent?](#why-use-pr-agent)
|
||||
- [Features](#features)
|
||||
- [Overview](#overview)
|
||||
- [See It in Action](#see-it-in-action)
|
||||
- [Try It Now](#try-it-now)
|
||||
- [Qodo Merge 💎](#qodo-merge-)
|
||||
- [How It Works](#how-it-works)
|
||||
- [Why Use PR-Agent?](#why-use-pr-agent)
|
||||
- [Data Privacy](#data-privacy)
|
||||
- [Contributing](#contributing)
|
||||
- [Links](#links)
|
||||
@ -44,7 +45,7 @@ PR-Agent aims to help efficiently review and handle pull requests, by providing
|
||||
## Getting Started
|
||||
|
||||
### Try it Instantly
|
||||
Test PR-Agent on any public GitHub repository by commenting `@CodiumAI-Agent /improve`
|
||||
Test PR-Agent on any public GitHub repository by commenting `@CodiumAI-Agent /improve`. The bot will reply with code suggestions
|
||||
|
||||
### GitHub Action
|
||||
Add automated PR reviews to your repository with a simple workflow file using [GitHub Action setup guide](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/installation/github/#run-as-a-github-action)
|
||||
@ -57,34 +58,24 @@ Add automated PR reviews to your repository with a simple workflow file using [G
|
||||
### CLI Usage
|
||||
Run PR-Agent locally on your repository via command line: [Local CLI setup guide](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/usage-guide/automations_and_usage/#local-repo-cli)
|
||||
|
||||
### Qodo Merge as post-commit in your local IDE
|
||||
See [here](https://github.com/qodo-ai/agents/tree/main/agents/qodo-merge-post-commit)
|
||||
|
||||
### Discover Qodo Merge 💎
|
||||
### Discover Qodo Merge 💎
|
||||
Zero-setup hosted solution with advanced features and priority support
|
||||
- **[FREE for Open Source](https://github.com/marketplace/qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source)**: Full features, zero cost for public repos
|
||||
- [Intro and Installation guide](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/installation/qodo_merge/)
|
||||
- [Plans & Pricing](https://www.qodo.ai/pricing/)
|
||||
|
||||
### Qodo Merge as a Post-commit in Your Local IDE
|
||||
You can receive automatic feedback from Qodo Merge on your local IDE after each [commit](https://github.com/qodo-ai/agents/tree/main/agents/qodo-merge-post-commit)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## News and Updates
|
||||
|
||||
## Jul 1, 2025
|
||||
You can now receive automatic feedback from Qodo Merge in your local IDE after each commit. Read more about it [here](https://github.com/qodo-ai/agents/tree/main/agents/qodo-merge-post-commit).
|
||||
|
||||
## Jun 21, 2025
|
||||
|
||||
v0.30 was [released](https://github.com/qodo-ai/pr-agent/releases)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Jun 3, 2025
|
||||
|
||||
Qodo Merge now offers a simplified free tier 💎.
|
||||
Organizations can use Qodo Merge at no cost, with a [monthly limit](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/installation/qodo_merge/#cloud-users) of 75 PR reviews per organization.
|
||||
|
||||
## May 17, 2025
|
||||
|
||||
- v0.29 was [released](https://github.com/qodo-ai/pr-agent/releases)
|
||||
- `Qodo Merge Pull Request Benchmark` was [released](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/pr_benchmark/). This benchmark evaluates and compares the performance of LLMs in analyzing pull request code.
|
||||
- `Recent Updates and Future Roadmap` page was added to the [Qodo Merge Docs](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/recent_updates/)
|
||||
|
||||
## Apr 30, 2025
|
||||
|
||||
@ -102,22 +93,11 @@ New tool for Qodo Merge 💎 - `/scan_repo_discussions`.
|
||||
|
||||
Read more about it [here](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/scan_repo_discussions/).
|
||||
|
||||
## Why Use PR-Agent?
|
||||
|
||||
A reasonable question that can be asked is: `"Why use PR-Agent? What makes it stand out from existing tools?"`
|
||||
|
||||
Here are some advantages of PR-Agent:
|
||||
|
||||
- We emphasize **real-life practical usage**. Each tool (review, improve, ask, ...) has a single LLM call, no more. We feel that this is critical for realistic team usage - obtaining an answer quickly (~30 seconds) and affordably.
|
||||
- Our [PR Compression strategy](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/#pr-compression-strategy) is a core ability that enables to effectively tackle both short and long PRs.
|
||||
- Our JSON prompting strategy enables us to have **modular, customizable tools**. For example, the '/review' tool categories can be controlled via the [configuration](pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml) file. Adding additional categories is easy and accessible.
|
||||
- We support **multiple git providers** (GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket), **multiple ways** to use the tool (CLI, GitHub Action, GitHub App, Docker, ...), and **multiple models** (GPT, Claude, Deepseek, ...)
|
||||
|
||||
## Features
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
<div style="text-align:left;">
|
||||
|
||||
PR-Agent and Qodo Merge offer comprehensive pull request functionalities integrated with various git providers:
|
||||
Supported commands per platform:
|
||||
|
||||
| | | GitHub | GitLab | Bitbucket | Azure DevOps | Gitea |
|
||||
|---------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:------:|:------:|:---------:|:------------:|:-----:|
|
||||
@ -207,7 +187,7 @@ ___
|
||||
|
||||
## Try It Now
|
||||
|
||||
Try the Claude Sonnet powered PR-Agent instantly on _your public GitHub repository_. Just mention `@CodiumAI-Agent` and add the desired command in any PR comment. The agent will generate a response based on your command.
|
||||
Try PR-Agent instantly on _your public GitHub repository_. Just mention `@CodiumAI-Agent` and add the desired command in any PR comment. The agent will generate a response based on your command.
|
||||
For example, add a comment to any pull request with the following text:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
@ -239,6 +219,17 @@ The following diagram illustrates PR-Agent tools and their flow:
|
||||
|
||||
Check out the [PR Compression strategy](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/#pr-compression-strategy) page for more details on how we convert a code diff to a manageable LLM prompt
|
||||
|
||||
## Why Use PR-Agent?
|
||||
|
||||
A reasonable question that can be asked is: `"Why use PR-Agent? What makes it stand out from existing tools?"`
|
||||
|
||||
Here are some advantages of PR-Agent:
|
||||
|
||||
- We emphasize **real-life practical usage**. Each tool (review, improve, ask, ...) has a single LLM call, no more. We feel that this is critical for realistic team usage - obtaining an answer quickly (~30 seconds) and affordably.
|
||||
- Our [PR Compression strategy](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/#pr-compression-strategy) is a core ability that enables to effectively tackle both short and long PRs.
|
||||
- Our JSON prompting strategy enables us to have **modular, customizable tools**. For example, the '/review' tool categories can be controlled via the [configuration](pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml) file. Adding additional categories is easy and accessible.
|
||||
- We support **multiple git providers** (GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket), **multiple ways** to use the tool (CLI, GitHub Action, GitHub App, Docker, ...), and **multiple models** (GPT, Claude, Deepseek, ...)
|
||||
|
||||
## Data Privacy
|
||||
|
||||
### Self-hosted PR-Agent
|
||||
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
FROM public.ecr.aws/lambda/python:3.12 AS base
|
||||
FROM public.ecr.aws/lambda/python:3.12
|
||||
|
||||
RUN dnf update -y && \
|
||||
dnf install -y gcc python3-devel git && \
|
||||
@ -9,10 +9,4 @@ RUN pip install --no-cache-dir . && rm pyproject.toml
|
||||
RUN pip install --no-cache-dir mangum==0.17.0
|
||||
COPY pr_agent/ ${LAMBDA_TASK_ROOT}/pr_agent/
|
||||
|
||||
FROM base AS github_lambda
|
||||
CMD ["pr_agent.servers.github_lambda_webhook.lambda_handler"]
|
||||
|
||||
FROM base AS gitlab_lambda
|
||||
CMD ["pr_agent.servers.gitlab_lambda_webhook.lambda_handler"]
|
||||
|
||||
FROM github_lambda
|
||||
CMD ["pr_agent.servers.serverless.serverless"]
|
||||
|
@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
<style>
|
||||
Untitled
|
||||
.search-section {
|
||||
max-width: 800px;
|
||||
margin: 0 auto;
|
||||
@ -201,23 +202,7 @@ h1 {
|
||||
|
||||
<script>
|
||||
window.addEventListener('load', function() {
|
||||
function extractText(responseText) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
console.log('responseText: ', responseText);
|
||||
const results = JSON.parse(responseText);
|
||||
const msg = results.message;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!msg || msg.trim() === '') {
|
||||
return "No results found";
|
||||
}
|
||||
return msg;
|
||||
} catch (error) {
|
||||
console.error('Error parsing results:', error);
|
||||
throw new Error("Failed parsing response message");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function displayResults(msg) {
|
||||
function displayResults(responseText) {
|
||||
const resultsContainer = document.getElementById('results');
|
||||
const spinner = document.getElementById('spinner');
|
||||
const searchContainer = document.querySelector('.search-container');
|
||||
@ -229,6 +214,8 @@ window.addEventListener('load', function() {
|
||||
searchContainer.scrollIntoView({ behavior: 'smooth', block: 'start' });
|
||||
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const results = JSON.parse(responseText);
|
||||
|
||||
marked.setOptions({
|
||||
breaks: true,
|
||||
gfm: true,
|
||||
@ -236,7 +223,7 @@ window.addEventListener('load', function() {
|
||||
sanitize: false
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const htmlContent = marked.parse(msg);
|
||||
const htmlContent = marked.parse(results.message);
|
||||
|
||||
resultsContainer.className = 'markdown-content';
|
||||
resultsContainer.innerHTML = htmlContent;
|
||||
@ -255,7 +242,7 @@ window.addEventListener('load', function() {
|
||||
}, 100);
|
||||
} catch (error) {
|
||||
console.error('Error parsing results:', error);
|
||||
resultsContainer.innerHTML = '<div class="error-message">Cannot process results</div>';
|
||||
resultsContainer.innerHTML = '<div class="error-message">Error processing results</div>';
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -288,24 +275,24 @@ window.addEventListener('load', function() {
|
||||
body: JSON.stringify(data)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
//const API_ENDPOINT = 'http://0.0.0.0:3000/api/v1/docs_help';
|
||||
// const API_ENDPOINT = 'http://0.0.0.0:3000/api/v1/docs_help';
|
||||
const API_ENDPOINT = 'https://help.merge.qodo.ai/api/v1/docs_help';
|
||||
|
||||
const response = await fetch(API_ENDPOINT, options);
|
||||
const responseText = await response.text();
|
||||
const msg = extractText(responseText);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!response.ok) {
|
||||
throw new Error(`An error (${response.status}) occurred during search: "${msg}"`);
|
||||
throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${response.status}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
displayResults(msg);
|
||||
|
||||
const responseText = await response.text();
|
||||
displayResults(responseText);
|
||||
} catch (error) {
|
||||
spinner.style.display = 'none';
|
||||
const errorDiv = document.createElement('div');
|
||||
errorDiv.className = 'error-message';
|
||||
errorDiv.textContent = error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error);
|
||||
resultsContainer.replaceChildren(errorDiv);
|
||||
resultsContainer.innerHTML = `
|
||||
<div class="error-message">
|
||||
An error occurred while searching. Please try again later.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
`;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ There are two possible paths leading to this auto-approval - one via the `review
|
||||
ensure_ticket_compliance = true # Default is false
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If `ensure_ticket_compliance` is set to `true`, auto-approval for the `review` toll path will be disabled if no ticket is linked to the PR, or if the PR is not fully compliant with a linked ticket. This ensures that PRs are only auto-approved if their associated tickets are properly resolved.
|
||||
If `ensure_ticket_compliance` is set to `true`, auto-approval will be disabled if no ticket is linked to the PR, or if the PR is not fully compliant with a linked ticket. This ensures that PRs are only auto-approved if their associated tickets are properly resolved.
|
||||
|
||||
You can also prevent auto-approval if the PR exceeds the ticket's scope (see [here](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/fetching_ticket_context/#configuration-options)).
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Incremental Update 💎
|
||||
|
||||
`Supported Git Platforms: GitHub, GitLab (Both cloud & server. For server: Version 17 and above)`
|
||||
`Supported Git Platforms: GitHub`
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
The Incremental Update feature helps users focus on feedback for their newest changes, making large PRs more manageable.
|
||||
|
@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ Qodo Merge utilizes a variety of core abilities to provide a comprehensive and e
|
||||
- [Auto approval](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/auto_approval/)
|
||||
- [Auto best practices](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/auto_best_practices/)
|
||||
- [Chat on code suggestions](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/chat_on_code_suggestions/)
|
||||
- [Chrome extension](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/chrome-extension/)
|
||||
- [Code validation](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/code_validation/) <!-- - [Compression strategy](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/compression_strategy/) -->
|
||||
- [Code validation](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/code_validation/)
|
||||
- [Compression strategy](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/compression_strategy/)
|
||||
- [Dynamic context](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/dynamic_context/)
|
||||
- [Fetching ticket context](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/fetching_ticket_context/)
|
||||
- [Impact evaluation](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/impact_evaluation/)
|
||||
|
@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ ___
|
||||
___
|
||||
|
||||
??? note "Q: Can Qodo Merge review draft/offline PRs?"
|
||||
#### Answer:<span style="display:none;">6</span>
|
||||
#### Answer:<span style="display:none;">5</span>
|
||||
|
||||
Yes. While Qodo Merge won't automatically review draft PRs, you can still get feedback by manually requesting it through [online commenting](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/usage-guide/automations_and_usage/#online-usage).
|
||||
|
||||
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ ___
|
||||
___
|
||||
|
||||
??? note "Q: Can the 'Review effort' feedback be calibrated or customized?"
|
||||
#### Answer:<span style="display:none;">7</span>
|
||||
#### Answer:<span style="display:none;">5</span>
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, you can customize review effort estimates using the `extra_instructions` configuration option (see [documentation](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/review/#configuration-options)).
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ To search the documentation site using natural language:
|
||||
|
||||
## Features
|
||||
|
||||
PR-Agent and Qodo Merge offer comprehensive pull request functionalities integrated with various git providers:
|
||||
PR-Agent and Qodo Merge offers extensive pull request functionalities across various git providers:
|
||||
|
||||
| | | GitHub | GitLab | Bitbucket | Azure DevOps | Gitea |
|
||||
| ----- |---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:------:|:------:|:---------:|:------------:|:-----:|
|
||||
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
## Azure DevOps Pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
You can use a pre-built Action Docker image to run PR-Agent as an Azure devops pipeline.
|
||||
Add the following file to your repository under `azure-pipelines.yml`:
|
||||
add the following file to your repository under `azure-pipelines.yml`:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
# Opt out of CI triggers
|
||||
@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ git_provider="azure"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Azure DevOps provider supports [PAT token](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/organizations/accounts/use-personal-access-tokens-to-authenticate?view=azure-devops&tabs=Windows) or [DefaultAzureCredential](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/developer/python/sdk/authentication-overview#authentication-in-server-environments) authentication.
|
||||
PAT is faster to create, but has built-in expiration date, and will use the user identity for API calls.
|
||||
PAT is faster to create, but has build in expiration date, and will use the user identity for API calls.
|
||||
Using DefaultAzureCredential you can use managed identity or Service principle, which are more secure and will create separate ADO user identity (via AAD) to the agent.
|
||||
|
||||
If PAT was chosen, you can assign the value in .secrets.toml.
|
||||
|
@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ git_provider="bitbucket_server"
|
||||
and pass the Pull request URL:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
python cli.py --pr_url https://git.on-prem-instance-of-bitbucket.com/projects/PROJECT/repos/REPO/pull-requests/1 review
|
||||
python cli.py --pr_url https://git.onpreminstanceofbitbucket.com/projects/PROJECT/repos/REPO/pull-requests/1 review
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Run it as service
|
||||
@ -63,6 +63,6 @@ docker push codiumai/pr-agent:bitbucket_server_webhook # Push to your Docker re
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Navigate to `Projects` or `Repositories`, `Settings`, `Webhooks`, `Create Webhook`.
|
||||
Fill in the name and URL. For Authentication, select 'None'. Select the 'Pull Request Opened' checkbox to receive that event as a webhook.
|
||||
Fill the name and URL, Authentication None select the Pull Request Opened checkbox to receive that event as webhook.
|
||||
|
||||
The URL should end with `/webhook`, for example: https://domain.com/webhook
|
||||
|
@ -17,11 +17,12 @@ git clone https://github.com/qodo-ai/pr-agent.git
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
5. Prepare variables and secrets. Skip this step if you plan on setting these as environment variables when running the agent:
|
||||
- In the configuration file/variables:
|
||||
- Set `config.git_provider` to "gitea"
|
||||
- In the secrets file/variables:
|
||||
- Set your AI model key in the respective section
|
||||
- In the [Gitea] section, set `personal_access_token` (with token from step 2) and `webhook_secret` (with secret from step 3)
|
||||
1. In the configuration file/variables:
|
||||
- Set `config.git_provider` to "gitea"
|
||||
|
||||
2. In the secrets file/variables:
|
||||
- Set your AI model key in the respective section
|
||||
- In the [Gitea] section, set `personal_access_token` (with token from step 2) and `webhook_secret` (with secret from step 3)
|
||||
|
||||
6. Build a Docker image for the app and optionally push it to a Docker repository. We'll use Dockerhub as an example:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -187,15 +187,14 @@ For example: `GITHUB.WEBHOOK_SECRET` --> `GITHUB__WEBHOOK_SECRET`
|
||||
2. Build a docker image that can be used as a lambda function
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
# Note: --target github_lambda is optional as it's the default target
|
||||
docker buildx build --platform=linux/amd64 . -t codiumai/pr-agent:github_lambda --target github_lambda -f docker/Dockerfile.lambda
|
||||
docker buildx build --platform=linux/amd64 . -t codiumai/pr-agent:serverless -f docker/Dockerfile.lambda
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. Push image to ECR
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
docker tag codiumai/pr-agent:github_lambda <AWS_ACCOUNT>.dkr.ecr.<AWS_REGION>.amazonaws.com/codiumai/pr-agent:github_lambda
|
||||
docker push <AWS_ACCOUNT>.dkr.ecr.<AWS_REGION>.amazonaws.com/codiumai/pr-agent:github_lambda
|
||||
docker tag codiumai/pr-agent:serverless <AWS_ACCOUNT>.dkr.ecr.<AWS_REGION>.amazonaws.com/codiumai/pr-agent:serverless
|
||||
docker push <AWS_ACCOUNT>.dkr.ecr.<AWS_REGION>.amazonaws.com/codiumai/pr-agent:serverless
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. Create a lambda function that uses the uploaded image. Set the lambda timeout to be at least 3m.
|
||||
|
@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Note that if your base branches are not protected, don't set the variables as `p
|
||||
|
||||
1. In GitLab create a new user and give it "Reporter" role ("Developer" if using Pro version of the agent) for the intended group or project.
|
||||
|
||||
2. For the user from step 1, generate a `personal_access_token` with `api` access.
|
||||
2. For the user from step 1. generate a `personal_access_token` with `api` access.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Generate a random secret for your app, and save it for later (`shared_secret`). For example, you can use:
|
||||
|
||||
@ -61,12 +61,12 @@ git clone https://github.com/qodo-ai/pr-agent.git
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
5. Prepare variables and secrets. Skip this step if you plan on setting these as environment variables when running the agent:
|
||||
1. In the configuration file/variables:
|
||||
- Set `config.git_provider` to "gitlab"
|
||||
1. In the configuration file/variables:
|
||||
- Set `config.git_provider` to "gitlab"
|
||||
|
||||
2. In the secrets file/variables:
|
||||
- Set your AI model key in the respective section
|
||||
- In the [gitlab] section, set `personal_access_token` (with token from step 2) and `shared_secret` (with secret from step 3)
|
||||
2. In the secrets file/variables:
|
||||
- Set your AI model key in the respective section
|
||||
- In the [gitlab] section, set `personal_access_token` (with token from step 2) and `shared_secret` (with secret from step 3)
|
||||
|
||||
6. Build a Docker image for the app and optionally push it to a Docker repository. We'll use Dockerhub as an example:
|
||||
|
||||
@ -88,63 +88,3 @@ OPENAI__KEY=<your_openai_api_key>
|
||||
8. Create a webhook in your GitLab project. Set the URL to `http[s]://<PR_AGENT_HOSTNAME>/webhook`, the secret token to the generated secret from step 3, and enable the triggers `push`, `comments` and `merge request events`.
|
||||
|
||||
9. Test your installation by opening a merge request or commenting on a merge request using one of PR Agent's commands.
|
||||
|
||||
## Deploy as a Lambda Function
|
||||
|
||||
Note that since AWS Lambda env vars cannot have "." in the name, you can replace each "." in an env variable with "__".<br>
|
||||
For example: `GITLAB.PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN` --> `GITLAB__PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN`
|
||||
|
||||
1. Follow steps 1-5 from [Run a GitLab webhook server](#run-a-gitlab-webhook-server).
|
||||
2. Build a docker image that can be used as a lambda function
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
docker buildx build --platform=linux/amd64 . -t codiumai/pr-agent:gitlab_lambda --target gitlab_lambda -f docker/Dockerfile.lambda
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. Push image to ECR
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
docker tag codiumai/pr-agent:gitlab_lambda <AWS_ACCOUNT>.dkr.ecr.<AWS_REGION>.amazonaws.com/codiumai/pr-agent:gitlab_lambda
|
||||
docker push <AWS_ACCOUNT>.dkr.ecr.<AWS_REGION>.amazonaws.com/codiumai/pr-agent:gitlab_lambda
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. Create a lambda function that uses the uploaded image. Set the lambda timeout to be at least 3m.
|
||||
5. Configure the lambda function to have a Function URL.
|
||||
6. In the environment variables of the Lambda function, specify `AZURE_DEVOPS_CACHE_DIR` to a writable location such as /tmp. (see [link](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/pull/450#issuecomment-1840242269))
|
||||
7. Go back to steps 8-9 of [Run a GitLab webhook server](#run-a-gitlab-webhook-server) with the function URL as your Webhook URL.
|
||||
The Webhook URL would look like `https://<LAMBDA_FUNCTION_URL>/webhook`
|
||||
|
||||
### Using AWS Secrets Manager
|
||||
|
||||
For production Lambda deployments, use AWS Secrets Manager instead of environment variables:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Create individual secrets for each GitLab webhook with this JSON format (e.g., secret name: `project-webhook-secret-001`)
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"gitlab_token": "glpat-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
|
||||
"token_name": "project-webhook-001"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. Create a main configuration secret for common settings (e.g., secret name: `pr-agent-main-config`)
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"openai.key": "sk-proj-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. Set these environment variables in your Lambda:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
CONFIG__SECRET_PROVIDER=aws_secrets_manager
|
||||
AWS_SECRETS_MANAGER__SECRET_ARN=arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:123456789012:secret:pr-agent-main-config-AbCdEf
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. In your GitLab webhook configuration, set the **Secret Token** to the **Secret name** created in step 1:
|
||||
- Example: `project-webhook-secret-001`
|
||||
|
||||
**Important**: When using Secrets Manager, GitLab's webhook secret must be the Secrets Manager secret name.
|
||||
|
||||
5. Add IAM permission `secretsmanager:GetSecretValue` to your Lambda execution role
|
@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ To invoke a tool (for example `review`), you can run PR-Agent directly from the
|
||||
- For GitHub:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
docker run --rm -it -e OPENAI.KEY=<your_openai_key> -e GITHUB.USER_TOKEN=<your_github_token> codiumai/pr-agent:latest --pr_url <pr_url> review
|
||||
docker run --rm -it -e OPENAI.KEY=<your key> -e GITHUB.USER_TOKEN=<your token> codiumai/pr-agent:latest --pr_url <pr_url> review
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If you are using GitHub enterprise server, you need to specify the custom url as variable.
|
||||
|
@ -3,8 +3,7 @@
|
||||
[Qodo Merge](https://www.codium.ai/pricing/){:target="_blank"} is a hosted version of the open-source [PR-Agent](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent){:target="_blank"}.
|
||||
It is designed for companies and teams that require additional features and capabilities.
|
||||
|
||||
Free users receive a quota of 75 monthly PR feedbacks per git organization. Unlimited usage requires a paid subscription. See [details](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/installation/qodo_merge/#cloud-users).
|
||||
|
||||
Free users receive a monthly quota of 75 PR reviews per git organization, while unlimited usage requires a paid subscription. See [details](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/installation/qodo_merge/#cloud-users).
|
||||
|
||||
Qodo Merge provides the following benefits:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3,18 +3,15 @@
|
||||
## Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
Qodo Merge PR Benchmark evaluates and compares the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in analyzing pull request code and providing meaningful code suggestions.
|
||||
Our diverse dataset contains 400 pull requests from over 100 repositories, spanning various programming languages and frameworks to reflect real-world scenarios.
|
||||
Our diverse dataset comprises of 400 pull requests from over 100 repositories, spanning various programming languages and frameworks to reflect real-world scenarios.
|
||||
|
||||
- For each pull request, we have pre-generated suggestions from eleven different top-performing models using the Qodo Merge `improve` tool. The prompt for response generation can be found [here](https://github.com/qodo-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/pr_agent/settings/code_suggestions/pr_code_suggestions_prompts_not_decoupled.toml).
|
||||
- For each pull request, we have pre-generated suggestions from [11](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/pr_benchmark/#models-used-for-generating-the-benchmark-baseline) different top-performing models using the Qodo Merge `improve` tool. The prompt for response generation can be found [here](https://github.com/qodo-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/pr_agent/settings/code_suggestions/pr_code_suggestions_prompts_not_decoupled.toml).
|
||||
|
||||
- To benchmark a model, we generate its suggestions for the same pull requests and ask a high-performing judge model to **rank** the new model's output against the pre-generated baseline suggestions. We utilize OpenAI's `o3` model as the judge, though other models have yielded consistent results. The prompt for this ranking judgment is available [here](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent-settings/tree/main/benchmark).
|
||||
- To benchmark a model, we generate its suggestions for the same pull requests and ask a high-performing judge model to **rank** the new model's output against the 11 pre-generated baseline suggestions. We utilize OpenAI's `o3` model as the judge, though other models have yielded consistent results. The prompt for this ranking judgment is available [here](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent-settings/tree/main/benchmark).
|
||||
|
||||
- We aggregate ranking outcomes across all pull requests, calculating performance metrics for the evaluated model.
|
||||
|
||||
- We also analyze the qualitative feedback from the judge to identify the model's comparative strengths and weaknesses against the established baselines.
|
||||
- We aggregate ranking outcomes across all pull requests, calculating performance metrics for the evaluated model. We also analyze the qualitative feedback from the judge to identify the model's comparative strengths and weaknesses against the established baselines.
|
||||
This approach provides not just a quantitative score but also a detailed analysis of each model's strengths and weaknesses.
|
||||
|
||||
A list of the models used for generating the baseline suggestions, and example results, can be found in the [Appendix](#appendix-example-results).
|
||||
|
||||
[//]: # (Note that this benchmark focuses on quality: the ability of an LLM to process complex pull request with multiple files and nuanced task to produce high-quality code suggestions.)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -22,7 +19,7 @@ A list of the models used for generating the baseline suggestions, and example r
|
||||
|
||||
[//]: # ()
|
||||
|
||||
## PR Benchmark Results
|
||||
## Results
|
||||
|
||||
<table>
|
||||
<thead>
|
||||
@ -70,24 +67,12 @@ A list of the models used for generating the baseline suggestions, and example r
|
||||
<td style="text-align:left;"></td>
|
||||
<td style="text-align:center;"><b>39.0</b></td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td style="text-align:left;">Codex-mini</td>
|
||||
<td style="text-align:left;">2025-06-20</td>
|
||||
<td style="text-align:left;"><a href="https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/codex-mini-latest">unknown</a></td>
|
||||
<td style="text-align:center;"><b>37.2</b></td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td style="text-align:left;">Gemini-2.5-flash</td>
|
||||
<td style="text-align:left;">2025-04-17</td>
|
||||
<td style="text-align:left;"></td>
|
||||
<td style="text-align:center;"><b>33.5</b></td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td style="text-align:left;">Claude-4-opus-20250514</td>
|
||||
<td style="text-align:left;">2025-05-14</td>
|
||||
<td style="text-align:left;"></td>
|
||||
<td style="text-align:center;"><b>32.8</b></td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td style="text-align:left;">Claude-3.7-sonnet</td>
|
||||
<td style="text-align:left;">2025-02-19</td>
|
||||
@ -211,7 +196,7 @@ weaknesses:
|
||||
- **Very low recall / shallow coverage:** In a large majority of cases it gives 0-1 suggestions and misses other evident, critical bugs highlighted by peer models, leading to inferior rankings.
|
||||
- **Occasional incorrect or harmful fixes:** A noticeable subset of answers propose changes that break functionality or misunderstand the code (e.g. bad constant, wrong header logic, speculative rollbacks).
|
||||
- **Non-actionable placeholders:** Some “improved_code” sections contain comments or “…” rather than real patches, reducing practical value.
|
||||
|
||||
-
|
||||
### GPT-4.1
|
||||
|
||||
Final score: **26.5**
|
||||
@ -229,73 +214,19 @@ weaknesses:
|
||||
- **Occasional technical inaccuracies:** A noticeable subset of suggestions are wrong (mis-ordered assertions, harmful Bash `set` change, false dangling-reference claims) or carry metadata errors (mis-labeling files as “python”).
|
||||
- **Repetitive / derivative fixes:** Many outputs duplicate earlier simplistic ideas (e.g., single null-check) without new insight, showing limited reasoning breadth.
|
||||
|
||||
### OpenAI codex-mini
|
||||
|
||||
final score: **37.2**
|
||||
## Appendix - models used for generating the benchmark baseline
|
||||
|
||||
strengths:
|
||||
- anthropic_sonnet_3.7_v1:0
|
||||
- claude-4-opus-20250514
|
||||
- claude-4-sonnet-20250514
|
||||
- claude-4-sonnet-20250514_thinking_2048
|
||||
- gemini-2.5-flash-preview-04-17
|
||||
- gemini-2.5-pro-preview-05-06
|
||||
- gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05_1024
|
||||
- gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05_4096
|
||||
- gpt-4.1
|
||||
- o3
|
||||
- o4-mini_medium
|
||||
|
||||
- **Can spot high-impact defects:** When it “locks on”, codex-mini often identifies the main runtime or security regression (e.g., race-conditions, logic inversions, blocking I/O, resource leaks) and proposes a minimal, direct patch that compiles and respects neighbouring style.
|
||||
- **Produces concise, scoped fixes:** Valid answers usually stay within the allowed 3-suggestion limit, reference only the added lines, and contain clear before/after snippets that reviewers can apply verbatim.
|
||||
- **Occasional broad coverage:** In a minority of cases the model catches multiple independent issues (logic + tests + docs) and outperforms every baseline answer, showing good contextual understanding of heterogeneous diffs.
|
||||
|
||||
weaknesses:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Output instability / format errors:** A very large share of responses are unusable—plain refusals, shell commands, or malformed/empty YAML—indicating brittle adherence to the required schema and tanking overall usefulness.
|
||||
- **Critical-miss rate:** Even when the format is correct the model frequently overlooks the single most serious bug the diff introduces, instead focusing on stylistic nits or speculative refactors.
|
||||
- **Introduces new problems:** Several suggestions add unsupported APIs, undeclared variables, wrong types, or break compilation, hurting trust in the recommendations.
|
||||
- **Rule violations:** It often edits lines outside the diff, exceeds the 3-suggestion cap, or labels cosmetic tweaks as “critical”, showing inconsistent guideline compliance.
|
||||
|
||||
### Claude-4 Opus
|
||||
|
||||
final score: **32.8**
|
||||
|
||||
strengths:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Format & rule adherence:** Almost always returns valid YAML, stays within the ≤3-suggestion limit, and usually restricts edits to newly-added lines, so its output is easy to apply automatically.
|
||||
- **Concise, focused patches:** When it does find a real bug it gives short, well-scoped explanations plus minimal diff snippets, often outperforming verbose baselines in clarity.
|
||||
- **Able to catch subtle edge-cases:** In several examples it detected overflow, race-condition or enum-mismatch issues that many other models missed, showing solid code‐analysis capability.
|
||||
|
||||
weaknesses:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Low recall / narrow coverage:** In a large share of the 399 examples the model produced an empty list or only one minor tip while more serious defects were present, causing it to be rated inferior to most baselines.
|
||||
- **Frequent incorrect or no-op fixes:** It sometimes supplies identical “before/after” code, flags non-issues, or suggests changes that would break compilation or logic, reducing reviewer trust.
|
||||
- **Shaky guideline consistency:** Although generally compliant, it still occasionally violates rules (touches unchanged lines, offers stylistic advice, adds imports) and duplicates suggestions, indicating unstable internal checks.
|
||||
|
||||
## Appendix - Example Results
|
||||
|
||||
Some examples of benchmarked PRs and their results:
|
||||
|
||||
- [Example 1](https://www.qodo.ai/images/qodo_merge_benchmark/example_results1.html)
|
||||
- [Example 2](https://www.qodo.ai/images/qodo_merge_benchmark/example_results2.html)
|
||||
- [Example 3](https://www.qodo.ai/images/qodo_merge_benchmark/example_results3.html)
|
||||
- [Example 4](https://www.qodo.ai/images/qodo_merge_benchmark/example_results4.html)
|
||||
|
||||
### Models Used for Benchmarking
|
||||
|
||||
The following models were used for generating the benchmark baseline:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
(1) anthropic_sonnet_3.7_v1:0
|
||||
|
||||
(2) claude-4-opus-20250514
|
||||
|
||||
(3) claude-4-sonnet-20250514
|
||||
|
||||
(4) claude-4-sonnet-20250514_thinking_2048
|
||||
|
||||
(5) gemini-2.5-flash-preview-04-17
|
||||
|
||||
(6) gemini-2.5-pro-preview-05-06
|
||||
|
||||
(7) gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05_1024
|
||||
|
||||
(8) gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05_4096
|
||||
|
||||
(9) gpt-4.1
|
||||
|
||||
(10) o3
|
||||
|
||||
(11) o4-mini_medium
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1,21 +1,23 @@
|
||||
# Recent Updates and Future Roadmap
|
||||
|
||||
`Page last updated: 2025-07-01`
|
||||
`Page last updated: 2025-06-01`
|
||||
|
||||
This page summarizes recent enhancements to Qodo Merge (last three months).
|
||||
|
||||
It also outlines our development roadmap for the upcoming three months. Please note that the roadmap is subject to change, and features may be adjusted, added, or reprioritized.
|
||||
|
||||
=== "Recent Updates"
|
||||
- **Receiving Qodo Merge feedback locally**: You can receive automatic feedback from Qodo Merge on your local IDE after each commit. ([Learn more](https://github.com/qodo-ai/agents/tree/main/agents/qodo-merge-post-commit)).
|
||||
- **Mermaid Diagrams**: Qodo Merge now generates by default Mermaid diagrams for PRs, providing a visual representation of code changes. ([Learn more](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/describe/#sequence-diagram-support))
|
||||
- **Best Practices Hierarchy**: Introducing support for structured best practices, such as for folders in monorepos or a unified best practice file for a group of repositories. ([Learn more](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/improve/#global-hierarchical-best-practices))
|
||||
- **Simplified Free Tier**: Qodo Merge now offers a simplified free tier with a monthly limit of 75 PR reviews per organization, replacing the previous two-week trial. ([Learn more](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/installation/qodo_merge/#cloud-users))
|
||||
- **CLI Endpoint**: A new Qodo Merge endpoint that accepts a lists of before/after code changes, executes Qodo Merge commands, and return the results. Currently available for enterprise customers. Contact [Qodo](https://www.qodo.ai/contact/) for more information.
|
||||
- **Linear tickets support**: Qodo Merge now supports Linear tickets. ([Learn more](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/fetching_ticket_context/#linear-integration))
|
||||
- **Smart Update**: Upon PR updates, Qodo Merge will offer tailored code suggestions, addressing both the entire PR and the specific incremental changes since the last feedback ([Learn more](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/incremental_update/))
|
||||
- **Smart Update**: Upon PR updates, Qodo Merge will offer tailored code suggestions, addressing both the entire PR and the specific incremental changes since the last feedback ([Learn more](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/incremental_update//))
|
||||
- **Qodo Merge Pull Request Benchmark** - evaluating the performance of LLMs in analyzing pull request code ([Learn more](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/pr_benchmark/))
|
||||
- **Chat on Suggestions**: Users can now chat with code suggestions ([Learn more](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/improve/#chat-on-code-suggestions))
|
||||
- **Scan Repo Discussions Tool**: A new tool that analyzes past code discussions to generate a `best_practices.md` file, distilling key insights and recommendations. ([Learn more](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/scan_repo_discussions/))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
=== "Future Roadmap"
|
||||
- **Best Practices Hierarchy**: Introducing support for structured best practices, such as for folders in monorepos or a unified best practice file for a group of repositories.
|
||||
- **Enhanced `review` tool**: Enhancing the `review` tool validate compliance across multiple categories including security, tickets, and custom best practices.
|
||||
- **Smarter context retrieval**: Leverage AST and LSP analysis to gather relevant context from across the entire repository.
|
||||
- **Enhanced portal experience**: Improved user experience in the Qodo Merge portal with new options and capabilities.
|
||||
|
@ -47,41 +47,29 @@ publish_labels = true
|
||||
|
||||
## Preserving the original user description
|
||||
|
||||
By default, Qodo Merge tries to preserve your original PR description by placing it above the generated content.
|
||||
By default, Qodo Merge preserves your original PR description by placing it above the generated content.
|
||||
This requires including your description during the initial PR creation.
|
||||
Be aware that if you edit the description while the automated tool is running, a race condition may occur, potentially causing your original description to be lost.
|
||||
|
||||
"Qodo removed the original description from the PR. Why"?
|
||||
|
||||
From our experience, there are two possible reasons:
|
||||
|
||||
- If you edit the description _while_ the automated tool is running, a race condition may occur, potentially causing your original description to be lost. Hence, create a description before launching the PR.
|
||||
|
||||
- When _updating_ PR descriptions, the `/describe` tool considers everything above the "PR Type" field as user content and will preserve it.
|
||||
When updating PR descriptions, the `/describe` tool considers everything above the "PR Type" field as user content and will preserve it.
|
||||
Everything below this marker is treated as previously auto-generated content and will be replaced.
|
||||
|
||||
{width=512}
|
||||
|
||||
## Sequence Diagram Support
|
||||
The `/describe` tool includes a Mermaid sequence diagram showing component/function interactions.
|
||||
### Sequence Diagram Support
|
||||
When the `enable_pr_diagram` option is enabled in your configuration, the `/describe` tool will include a `Mermaid` sequence diagram in the PR description.
|
||||
|
||||
This option is enabled by default via the `pr_description.enable_pr_diagram` param.
|
||||
This diagram represents interactions between components/functions based on the diff content.
|
||||
|
||||
### How to enable
|
||||
|
||||
[//]: # (### How to enable\disable)
|
||||
In your configuration:
|
||||
|
||||
[//]: # ()
|
||||
[//]: # (In your configuration:)
|
||||
|
||||
[//]: # ()
|
||||
[//]: # (```)
|
||||
|
||||
[//]: # (toml)
|
||||
|
||||
[//]: # ([pr_description])
|
||||
|
||||
[//]: # (enable_pr_diagram = true)
|
||||
|
||||
[//]: # (```)
|
||||
```
|
||||
toml
|
||||
[pr_description]
|
||||
enable_pr_diagram = true
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Configuration options
|
||||
|
||||
@ -129,8 +117,8 @@ This option is enabled by default via the `pr_description.enable_pr_diagram` par
|
||||
<td>If set to true, the file list in the "Changes walkthrough" section will be collapsible. If set to "adaptive", the file list will be collapsible only if there are more than 8 files. Default is "adaptive".</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td><b>enable_large_pr_handling 💎</b></td>
|
||||
<td>If set to true, in case of a large PR the tool will make several calls to the AI and combine them to be able to cover more files. Default is true.</td>
|
||||
<td><b>enable_large_pr_handling</b></td>
|
||||
<td>Pro feature. If set to true, in case of a large PR the tool will make several calls to the AI and combine them to be able to cover more files. Default is true.</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td><b>enable_help_text</b></td>
|
||||
@ -138,7 +126,7 @@ This option is enabled by default via the `pr_description.enable_pr_diagram` par
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td><b>enable_pr_diagram</b></td>
|
||||
<td>If set to true, the tool will generate a horizontal Mermaid flowchart summarizing the main pull request changes. This field remains empty if not applicable. Default is true.</td>
|
||||
<td>If set to true, the tool will generate a horizontal Mermaid flowchart summarizing the main pull request changes. This field remains empty if not applicable. Default is false.</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
</table>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -182,12 +170,9 @@ pr_agent:summary
|
||||
|
||||
## PR Walkthrough:
|
||||
pr_agent:walkthrough
|
||||
|
||||
## PR Diagram:
|
||||
pr_agent:diagram
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The marker `pr_agent:type` will be replaced with the PR type, `pr_agent:summary` will be replaced with the PR summary, `pr_agent:walkthrough` will be replaced with the PR walkthrough, and `pr_agent:diagram` will be replaced with the sequence diagram (if enabled).
|
||||
The marker `pr_agent:type` will be replaced with the PR type, `pr_agent:summary` will be replaced with the PR summary, and `pr_agent:walkthrough` will be replaced with the PR walkthrough.
|
||||
|
||||
{width=512}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -199,7 +184,6 @@ becomes
|
||||
|
||||
- `use_description_markers`: if set to true, the tool will use markers template. It replaces every marker of the form `pr_agent:marker_name` with the relevant content. Default is false.
|
||||
- `include_generated_by_header`: if set to true, the tool will add a dedicated header: 'Generated by PR Agent at ...' to any automatic content. Default is true.
|
||||
- `diagram`: if present as a marker, will be replaced by the PR sequence diagram (if enabled).
|
||||
|
||||
## Custom labels
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -437,26 +437,9 @@ dual_publishing_score_threshold = x
|
||||
|
||||
Where x represents the minimum score threshold (>=) for suggestions to be presented as committable PR comments in addition to the table. Default is -1 (disabled).
|
||||
|
||||
### Controlling suggestions depth
|
||||
|
||||
> `💎 feature`
|
||||
|
||||
You can control the depth and comprehensiveness of the code suggestions by using the `pr_code_suggestions.suggestions_depth` parameter.
|
||||
|
||||
Available options:
|
||||
|
||||
- `selective` - Shows only suggestions above a score threshold of 6
|
||||
- `regular` - Default mode with balanced suggestion coverage
|
||||
- `exhaustive` - Provides maximum suggestion comprehensiveness
|
||||
|
||||
(Alternatively, use numeric values: 1, 2, or 3 respectively)
|
||||
|
||||
We recommend starting with `regular` mode, then exploring `exhaustive` mode, which can provide more comprehensive suggestions and enhanced bug detection.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Self-review
|
||||
|
||||
> `💎 feature. Platforms supported: GitHub, GitLab`
|
||||
> `💎 feature` Platforms supported: GitHub, GitLab
|
||||
|
||||
If you set in a configuration file:
|
||||
|
||||
@ -538,10 +521,6 @@ Note: Chunking is primarily relevant for large PRs. For most PRs (up to 600 line
|
||||
<td><b>enable_chat_in_code_suggestions</b></td>
|
||||
<td>If set to true, QM bot will interact with comments made on code changes it has proposed. Default is true.</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td><b>suggestions_depth 💎</b></td>
|
||||
<td> Controls the depth of the suggestions. Can be set to 'selective', 'regular', or 'exhaustive'. Default is 'regular'.</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td><b>dual_publishing_score_threshold</b></td>
|
||||
<td>Minimum score threshold for suggestions to be presented as committable PR comments in addition to the table. Default is -1 (disabled).</td>
|
||||
|
@ -98,11 +98,6 @@ extra_instructions = "..."
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td><b>require_security_review</b></td>
|
||||
<td>If set to true, the tool will add a section that checks if the PR contains a possible security or vulnerability issue. Default is true.</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td><b>require_todo_scan</b></td>
|
||||
<td>If set to true, the tool will add a section that lists TODO comments found in the PR code changes. Default is false.
|
||||
</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td><b>require_ticket_analysis_review</b></td>
|
||||
|
@ -250,15 +250,3 @@ Where the `ignore_pr_authors` is a list of usernames that you want to ignore.
|
||||
|
||||
!!! note
|
||||
There is one specific case where bots will receive an automatic response - when they generated a PR with a _failed test_. In that case, the [`ci_feedback`](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/ci_feedback/) tool will be invoked.
|
||||
|
||||
### Ignoring Generated Files by Language/Framework
|
||||
|
||||
To automatically exclude files generated by specific languages or frameworks, you can add the following to your `configuration.toml` file:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[config]
|
||||
ignore_language_framework = ['protobuf', ...]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
You can view the list of auto-generated file patterns in [`generated_code_ignore.toml`](https://github.com/qodo-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/pr_agent/settings/generated_code_ignore.toml).
|
||||
Files matching these glob patterns will be automatically excluded from PR Agent analysis.
|
@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ duplicate_examples=true # will duplicate the examples in the prompt, to help the
|
||||
api_base = "http://localhost:11434" # or whatever port you're running Ollama on
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
By default, Ollama uses a context window size of 2048 tokens. In most cases this is not enough to cover pr-agent prompt and pull-request diff. Context window size can be overridden with the `OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH` environment variable. For example, to set the default context length to 8K, use: `OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH=8192 ollama serve`. More information you can find on the [official ollama faq](https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/main/docs/faq.md#how-can-i-specify-the-context-window-size).
|
||||
By default, Ollama uses a context window size of 2048 tokens. In most cases this is not enough to cover pr-agent promt and pull-request diff. Context window size can be overridden with the `OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH` environment variable. For example, to set the default context length to 8K, use: `OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH=8192 ollama serve`. More information you can find on the [official ollama faq](https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/main/docs/faq.md#how-can-i-specify-the-context-window-size).
|
||||
|
||||
Please note that the `custom_model_max_tokens` setting should be configured in accordance with the `OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH`. Failure to do so may result in unexpected model output.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -232,14 +232,6 @@ AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY="..."
|
||||
AWS_REGION_NAME="..."
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
You can also use the new Meta Llama 4 models available on Amazon Bedrock:
|
||||
|
||||
```toml
|
||||
[config] # in configuration.toml
|
||||
model="bedrock/us.meta.llama4-scout-17b-instruct-v1:0"
|
||||
fallback_models=["bedrock/us.meta.llama4-maverick-17b-instruct-v1:0"]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
See [litellm](https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/providers/bedrock#usage) documentation for more information about the environment variables required for Amazon Bedrock.
|
||||
|
||||
### DeepSeek
|
||||
|
@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ nav:
|
||||
- Auto approval: 'core-abilities/auto_approval.md'
|
||||
- Auto best practices: 'core-abilities/auto_best_practices.md'
|
||||
- Chat on code suggestions: 'core-abilities/chat_on_code_suggestions.md'
|
||||
- Chrome extension: 'chrome-extension/index.md'
|
||||
- Code validation: 'core-abilities/code_validation.md'
|
||||
# - Compression strategy: 'core-abilities/compression_strategy.md'
|
||||
- Dynamic context: 'core-abilities/dynamic_context.md'
|
||||
@ -58,11 +57,11 @@ nav:
|
||||
- RAG context enrichment: 'core-abilities/rag_context_enrichment.md'
|
||||
- Self-reflection: 'core-abilities/self_reflection.md'
|
||||
- Static code analysis: 'core-abilities/static_code_analysis.md'
|
||||
# - Chrome Extension:
|
||||
# - Qodo Merge Chrome Extension: 'chrome-extension/index.md'
|
||||
# - Features: 'chrome-extension/features.md'
|
||||
# - Data Privacy: 'chrome-extension/data_privacy.md'
|
||||
# - Options: 'chrome-extension/options.md'
|
||||
- Chrome Extension:
|
||||
- Qodo Merge Chrome Extension: 'chrome-extension/index.md'
|
||||
- Features: 'chrome-extension/features.md'
|
||||
- Data Privacy: 'chrome-extension/data_privacy.md'
|
||||
- Options: 'chrome-extension/options.md'
|
||||
- PR Benchmark:
|
||||
- PR Benchmark: 'pr_benchmark/index.md'
|
||||
- Recent Updates:
|
||||
|
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ class PRAgent:
|
||||
def __init__(self, ai_handler: partial[BaseAiHandler,] = LiteLLMAIHandler):
|
||||
self.ai_handler = ai_handler # will be initialized in run_action
|
||||
|
||||
async def _handle_request(self, pr_url, request, notify=None) -> bool:
|
||||
async def handle_request(self, pr_url, request, notify=None) -> bool:
|
||||
# First, apply repo specific settings if exists
|
||||
apply_repo_settings(pr_url)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -117,10 +117,3 @@ class PRAgent:
|
||||
else:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
return True
|
||||
|
||||
async def handle_request(self, pr_url, request, notify=None) -> bool:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
return await self._handle_request(pr_url, request, notify)
|
||||
except:
|
||||
get_logger().exception("Failed to process the command.")
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
@ -62,23 +62,19 @@ MAX_TOKENS = {
|
||||
'vertex_ai/gemini-2.5-pro-preview-03-25': 1048576,
|
||||
'vertex_ai/gemini-2.5-pro-preview-05-06': 1048576,
|
||||
'vertex_ai/gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05': 1048576,
|
||||
'vertex_ai/gemini-2.5-pro': 1048576,
|
||||
'vertex_ai/gemini-1.5-flash': 1048576,
|
||||
'vertex_ai/gemini-2.0-flash': 1048576,
|
||||
'vertex_ai/gemini-2.5-flash-preview-04-17': 1048576,
|
||||
'vertex_ai/gemini-2.5-flash-preview-05-20': 1048576,
|
||||
'vertex_ai/gemini-2.5-flash': 1048576,
|
||||
'vertex_ai/gemma2': 8200,
|
||||
'gemini/gemini-1.5-pro': 1048576,
|
||||
'gemini/gemini-1.5-flash': 1048576,
|
||||
'gemini/gemini-2.0-flash': 1048576,
|
||||
'gemini/gemini-2.5-flash-preview-04-17': 1048576,
|
||||
'gemini/gemini-2.5-flash-preview-05-20': 1048576,
|
||||
'gemini/gemini-2.5-flash': 1048576,
|
||||
'gemini/gemini-2.5-pro-preview-03-25': 1048576,
|
||||
'gemini/gemini-2.5-pro-preview-05-06': 1048576,
|
||||
'gemini/gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05': 1048576,
|
||||
'gemini/gemini-2.5-pro': 1048576,
|
||||
'codechat-bison': 6144,
|
||||
'codechat-bison-32k': 32000,
|
||||
'anthropic.claude-instant-v1': 100000,
|
||||
@ -113,8 +109,6 @@ MAX_TOKENS = {
|
||||
'claude-3-5-sonnet': 100000,
|
||||
'groq/meta-llama/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct': 131072,
|
||||
'groq/meta-llama/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct': 131072,
|
||||
'bedrock/us.meta.llama4-scout-17b-instruct-v1:0': 128000,
|
||||
'bedrock/us.meta.llama4-maverick-17b-instruct-v1:0': 128000,
|
||||
'groq/llama3-8b-8192': 8192,
|
||||
'groq/llama3-70b-8192': 8192,
|
||||
'groq/llama-3.1-8b-instant': 8192,
|
||||
|
@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ class LiteLLMAIHandler(BaseAiHandler):
|
||||
self.api_base = openrouter_api_base
|
||||
litellm.api_base = openrouter_api_base
|
||||
|
||||
# Models that only use user message
|
||||
# Models that only use user meessage
|
||||
self.user_message_only_models = USER_MESSAGE_ONLY_MODELS
|
||||
|
||||
# Model that doesn't support temperature argument
|
||||
@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ class LiteLLMAIHandler(BaseAiHandler):
|
||||
|
||||
return kwargs
|
||||
|
||||
def add_litellm_callbacks(self, kwargs) -> dict:
|
||||
def add_litellm_callbacks(selfs, kwargs) -> dict:
|
||||
captured_extra = []
|
||||
|
||||
def capture_logs(message):
|
||||
|
@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ import fnmatch
|
||||
import re
|
||||
|
||||
from pr_agent.config_loader import get_settings
|
||||
from pr_agent.log import get_logger
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def filter_ignored(files, platform = 'github'):
|
||||
@ -18,17 +17,7 @@ def filter_ignored(files, platform = 'github'):
|
||||
glob_setting = get_settings().ignore.glob
|
||||
if isinstance(glob_setting, str): # --ignore.glob=[.*utils.py], --ignore.glob=.*utils.py
|
||||
glob_setting = glob_setting.strip('[]').split(",")
|
||||
patterns += translate_globs_to_regexes(glob_setting)
|
||||
|
||||
code_generators = get_settings().config.get('ignore_language_framework', [])
|
||||
if isinstance(code_generators, str):
|
||||
get_logger().warning("'ignore_language_framework' should be a list. Skipping language framework filtering.")
|
||||
code_generators = []
|
||||
for cg in code_generators:
|
||||
glob_patterns = get_settings().generated_code.get(cg, [])
|
||||
if isinstance(glob_patterns, str):
|
||||
glob_patterns = [glob_patterns]
|
||||
patterns += translate_globs_to_regexes(glob_patterns)
|
||||
patterns += [fnmatch.translate(glob) for glob in glob_setting]
|
||||
|
||||
# compile all valid patterns
|
||||
compiled_patterns = []
|
||||
@ -77,11 +66,3 @@ def filter_ignored(files, platform = 'github'):
|
||||
print(f"Could not filter file list: {e}")
|
||||
|
||||
return files
|
||||
|
||||
def translate_globs_to_regexes(globs: list):
|
||||
regexes = []
|
||||
for pattern in globs:
|
||||
regexes.append(fnmatch.translate(pattern))
|
||||
if pattern.startswith("**/"): # cover root-level files
|
||||
regexes.append(fnmatch.translate(pattern[3:]))
|
||||
return regexes
|
||||
|
@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import ast
|
||||
import copy
|
||||
import difflib
|
||||
import hashlib
|
||||
@ -15,7 +14,7 @@ import traceback
|
||||
from datetime import datetime
|
||||
from enum import Enum
|
||||
from importlib.metadata import PackageNotFoundError, version
|
||||
from typing import Any, List, Tuple, TypedDict
|
||||
from typing import Any, List, Tuple
|
||||
|
||||
import html2text
|
||||
import requests
|
||||
@ -38,31 +37,21 @@ def get_model(model_type: str = "model_weak") -> str:
|
||||
return get_settings().config.model_reasoning
|
||||
return get_settings().config.model
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Range(BaseModel):
|
||||
line_start: int # should be 0-indexed
|
||||
line_end: int
|
||||
column_start: int = -1
|
||||
column_end: int = -1
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ModelType(str, Enum):
|
||||
REGULAR = "regular"
|
||||
WEAK = "weak"
|
||||
REASONING = "reasoning"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TodoItem(TypedDict):
|
||||
relevant_file: str
|
||||
line_range: Tuple[int, int]
|
||||
content: str
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class PRReviewHeader(str, Enum):
|
||||
REGULAR = "## PR Reviewer Guide"
|
||||
INCREMENTAL = "## Incremental PR Reviewer Guide"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ReasoningEffort(str, Enum):
|
||||
HIGH = "high"
|
||||
MEDIUM = "medium"
|
||||
@ -120,7 +109,6 @@ def unique_strings(input_list: List[str]) -> List[str]:
|
||||
seen.add(item)
|
||||
return unique_list
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def convert_to_markdown_v2(output_data: dict,
|
||||
gfm_supported: bool = True,
|
||||
incremental_review=None,
|
||||
@ -143,7 +131,6 @@ def convert_to_markdown_v2(output_data: dict,
|
||||
"Focused PR": "✨",
|
||||
"Relevant ticket": "🎫",
|
||||
"Security concerns": "🔒",
|
||||
"Todo sections": "📝",
|
||||
"Insights from user's answers": "📝",
|
||||
"Code feedback": "🤖",
|
||||
"Estimated effort to review [1-5]": "⏱️",
|
||||
@ -164,7 +151,6 @@ def convert_to_markdown_v2(output_data: dict,
|
||||
if gfm_supported:
|
||||
markdown_text += "<table>\n"
|
||||
|
||||
todo_summary = output_data['review'].pop('todo_summary', '')
|
||||
for key, value in output_data['review'].items():
|
||||
if value is None or value == '' or value == {} or value == []:
|
||||
if key.lower() not in ['can_be_split', 'key_issues_to_review']:
|
||||
@ -223,23 +209,6 @@ def convert_to_markdown_v2(output_data: dict,
|
||||
markdown_text += f"### {emoji} Security concerns\n\n"
|
||||
value = emphasize_header(value.strip(), only_markdown=True)
|
||||
markdown_text += f"{value}\n\n"
|
||||
elif 'todo sections' in key_nice.lower():
|
||||
if gfm_supported:
|
||||
markdown_text += "<tr><td>"
|
||||
if is_value_no(value):
|
||||
markdown_text += f"✅ <strong>No TODO sections</strong>"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
markdown_todo_items = format_todo_items(value, git_provider, gfm_supported)
|
||||
markdown_text += f"{emoji} <strong>TODO sections</strong>\n<br><br>\n"
|
||||
markdown_text += markdown_todo_items
|
||||
markdown_text += "</td></tr>\n"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
if is_value_no(value):
|
||||
markdown_text += f"### ✅ No TODO sections\n\n"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
markdown_todo_items = format_todo_items(value, git_provider, gfm_supported)
|
||||
markdown_text += f"### {emoji} TODO sections\n\n"
|
||||
markdown_text += markdown_todo_items
|
||||
elif 'can be split' in key_nice.lower():
|
||||
if gfm_supported:
|
||||
markdown_text += f"<tr><td>"
|
||||
@ -1320,7 +1289,7 @@ def process_description(description_full: str) -> Tuple[str, List]:
|
||||
pattern_back = r'<details>\s*<summary><strong>(.*?)</strong><dd><code>(.*?)</code>.*?</summary>\s*<hr>\s*(.*?)\n\n\s*(.*?)</details>'
|
||||
res = re.search(pattern_back, file_data, re.DOTALL)
|
||||
if not res or res.lastindex != 4:
|
||||
pattern_back = r'<details>\s*<summary><strong>(.*?)</strong>\s*<dd><code>(.*?)</code>.*?</summary>\s*<hr>\s*(.*?)\s*-\s*(.*?)\s*</details>' # looking for hyphen ('- ')
|
||||
pattern_back = r'<details>\s*<summary><strong>(.*?)</strong>\s*<dd><code>(.*?)</code>.*?</summary>\s*<hr>\s*(.*?)\s*-\s*(.*?)\s*</details>' # looking for hypen ('- ')
|
||||
res = re.search(pattern_back, file_data, re.DOTALL)
|
||||
if res and res.lastindex == 4:
|
||||
short_filename = res.group(1).strip()
|
||||
@ -1398,47 +1367,3 @@ def set_file_languages(diff_files) -> List[FilePatchInfo]:
|
||||
get_logger().exception(f"Failed to set file languages: {e}")
|
||||
|
||||
return diff_files
|
||||
|
||||
def format_todo_item(todo_item: TodoItem, git_provider, gfm_supported) -> str:
|
||||
relevant_file = todo_item.get('relevant_file', '').strip()
|
||||
line_number = todo_item.get('line_number', '')
|
||||
content = todo_item.get('content', '')
|
||||
reference_link = git_provider.get_line_link(relevant_file, line_number, line_number)
|
||||
file_ref = f"{relevant_file} [{line_number}]"
|
||||
if reference_link:
|
||||
if gfm_supported:
|
||||
file_ref = f"<a href='{reference_link}'>{file_ref}</a>"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
file_ref = f"[{file_ref}]({reference_link})"
|
||||
|
||||
if content:
|
||||
return f"{file_ref}: {content.strip()}"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# if content is empty, return only the file reference
|
||||
return file_ref
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def format_todo_items(value: list[TodoItem] | TodoItem, git_provider, gfm_supported) -> str:
|
||||
markdown_text = ""
|
||||
MAX_ITEMS = 5 # limit the number of items to display
|
||||
if gfm_supported:
|
||||
if isinstance(value, list):
|
||||
markdown_text += "<ul>\n"
|
||||
if len(value) > MAX_ITEMS:
|
||||
get_logger().debug(f"Truncating todo items to {MAX_ITEMS} items")
|
||||
value = value[:MAX_ITEMS]
|
||||
for todo_item in value:
|
||||
markdown_text += f"<li>{format_todo_item(todo_item, git_provider, gfm_supported)}</li>\n"
|
||||
markdown_text += "</ul>\n"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
markdown_text += f"<p>{format_todo_item(value, git_provider, gfm_supported)}</p>\n"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
if isinstance(value, list):
|
||||
if len(value) > MAX_ITEMS:
|
||||
get_logger().debug(f"Truncating todo items to {MAX_ITEMS} items")
|
||||
value = value[:MAX_ITEMS]
|
||||
for todo_item in value:
|
||||
markdown_text += f"- {format_todo_item(todo_item, git_provider, gfm_supported)}\n"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
markdown_text += f"- {format_todo_item(value, git_provider, gfm_supported)}\n"
|
||||
return markdown_text
|
@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ global_settings = Dynaconf(
|
||||
settings_files=[join(current_dir, f) for f in [
|
||||
"settings/configuration.toml",
|
||||
"settings/ignore.toml",
|
||||
"settings/generated_code_ignore.toml",
|
||||
"settings/language_extensions.toml",
|
||||
"settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml",
|
||||
"settings/pr_questions_prompts.toml",
|
||||
|
@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ try:
|
||||
from azure.devops.connection import Connection
|
||||
# noinspection PyUnresolvedReferences
|
||||
from azure.devops.released.git import (Comment, CommentThread, GitPullRequest, GitVersionDescriptor, GitClient, CommentThreadContext, CommentPosition)
|
||||
from azure.devops.released.work_item_tracking import WorkItemTrackingClient
|
||||
# noinspection PyUnresolvedReferences
|
||||
from azure.identity import DefaultAzureCredential
|
||||
from msrest.authentication import BasicAuthentication
|
||||
@ -40,7 +39,7 @@ class AzureDevopsProvider(GitProvider):
|
||||
"Azure DevOps provider is not available. Please install the required dependencies."
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
self.azure_devops_client, self.azure_devops_board_client = self._get_azure_devops_client()
|
||||
self.azure_devops_client = self._get_azure_devops_client()
|
||||
self.diff_files = None
|
||||
self.workspace_slug = None
|
||||
self.repo_slug = None
|
||||
@ -567,7 +566,7 @@ class AzureDevopsProvider(GitProvider):
|
||||
return workspace_slug, repo_slug, pr_number
|
||||
|
||||
@staticmethod
|
||||
def _get_azure_devops_client() -> Tuple[GitClient, WorkItemTrackingClient]:
|
||||
def _get_azure_devops_client() -> GitClient:
|
||||
org = get_settings().azure_devops.get("org", None)
|
||||
pat = get_settings().azure_devops.get("pat", None)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -589,12 +588,13 @@ class AzureDevopsProvider(GitProvider):
|
||||
get_logger().error(f"No PAT found in settings, and Azure Default Authentication failed, error: {e}")
|
||||
raise
|
||||
|
||||
credentials = BasicAuthentication("", auth_token)
|
||||
|
||||
credentials = BasicAuthentication("", auth_token)
|
||||
azure_devops_connection = Connection(base_url=org, creds=credentials)
|
||||
azure_devops_client = azure_devops_connection.clients.get_git_client()
|
||||
azure_devops_board_client = azure_devops_connection.clients.get_work_item_tracking_client()
|
||||
|
||||
return azure_devops_client, azure_devops_board_client
|
||||
return azure_devops_client
|
||||
|
||||
def _get_repo(self):
|
||||
if self.repo is None:
|
||||
@ -635,50 +635,4 @@ class AzureDevopsProvider(GitProvider):
|
||||
last = commits[0]
|
||||
url = self.azure_devops_client.normalized_url + "/" + self.workspace_slug + "/_git/" + self.repo_slug + "/commit/" + last.commit_id
|
||||
return url
|
||||
|
||||
def get_linked_work_items(self) -> list:
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Get linked work items from the PR.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
try:
|
||||
work_items = self.azure_devops_client.get_pull_request_work_item_refs(
|
||||
project=self.workspace_slug,
|
||||
repository_id=self.repo_slug,
|
||||
pull_request_id=self.pr_num,
|
||||
)
|
||||
ids = [work_item.id for work_item in work_items]
|
||||
if not work_items:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
items = self.get_work_items(ids)
|
||||
return items
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
get_logger().exception(f"Failed to get linked work items, error: {e}")
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
def get_work_items(self, work_item_ids: list) -> list:
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Get work items by their IDs.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
try:
|
||||
raw_work_items = self.azure_devops_board_client.get_work_items(
|
||||
project=self.workspace_slug,
|
||||
ids=work_item_ids,
|
||||
)
|
||||
work_items = []
|
||||
for item in raw_work_items:
|
||||
work_items.append(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": item.id,
|
||||
"title": item.fields.get("System.Title", ""),
|
||||
"url": item.url,
|
||||
"body": item.fields.get("System.Description", ""),
|
||||
"acceptance_criteria": item.fields.get(
|
||||
"Microsoft.VSTS.Common.AcceptanceCriteria", ""
|
||||
),
|
||||
"tags": item.fields.get("System.Tags", "").split("; ") if item.fields.get("System.Tags") else [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
return work_items
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
get_logger().exception(f"Failed to get work items, error: {e}")
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ class BitbucketServerProvider(GitProvider):
|
||||
|
||||
def get_repo_settings(self):
|
||||
try:
|
||||
content = self.bitbucket_client.get_content_of_file(self.workspace_slug, self.repo_slug, ".pr_agent.toml")
|
||||
content = self.bitbucket_client.get_content_of_file(self.workspace_slug, self.repo_slug, ".pr_agent.toml", self.get_pr_branch())
|
||||
|
||||
return content
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
|
@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ def prepare_repo(url: urllib3.util.Url, project, refspec):
|
||||
repo_url = (f"{url.scheme}://{url.auth}@{url.host}:{url.port}/{project}")
|
||||
|
||||
directory = pathlib.Path(mkdtemp())
|
||||
clone(repo_url, directory)
|
||||
clone(repo_url, directory),
|
||||
fetch(repo_url, refspec, cwd=directory)
|
||||
checkout(cwd=directory)
|
||||
return directory
|
||||
|
@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Qodo Merge",
|
||||
"description": "Qodo Merge",
|
||||
"key": "app_key",
|
||||
"vendor": {
|
||||
"name": "Qodo",
|
||||
"url": "https://qodo.ai"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"authentication": {
|
||||
"type": "jwt"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"baseUrl": "base_url",
|
||||
"lifecycle": {
|
||||
"installed": "/installed",
|
||||
"uninstalled": "/uninstalled"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"scopes": [
|
||||
"account",
|
||||
"repository:write",
|
||||
"pullrequest:write",
|
||||
"wiki"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"contexts": [
|
||||
"account"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"modules": {
|
||||
"webhooks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"event": "*",
|
||||
"url": "/webhook"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"links": {
|
||||
"privacy": "https://qodo.ai/privacy-policy",
|
||||
"terms": "https://qodo.ai/terms"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ import json
|
||||
import os
|
||||
from typing import Union
|
||||
|
||||
from dynaconf.utils import DynaBox
|
||||
|
||||
from pr_agent.agent.pr_agent import PRAgent
|
||||
from pr_agent.config_loader import get_settings
|
||||
from pr_agent.git_providers import get_git_provider
|
||||
@ -91,7 +93,7 @@ async def run_action():
|
||||
|
||||
for key in get_settings():
|
||||
setting = get_settings().get(key)
|
||||
if str(type(setting)) == "<class 'dynaconf.utils.boxing.DynaBox'>":
|
||||
if isinstance(setting, DynaBox):
|
||||
if key.lower() in ['pr_description', 'pr_code_suggestions', 'pr_reviewer']:
|
||||
if hasattr(setting, 'extra_instructions'):
|
||||
extra_instructions = setting.extra_instructions
|
||||
|
@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
|
||||
from fastapi import FastAPI
|
||||
from mangum import Mangum
|
||||
from starlette.middleware import Middleware
|
||||
from starlette_context.middleware import RawContextMiddleware
|
||||
|
||||
from pr_agent.servers.gitlab_webhook import router
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
from pr_agent.config_loader import apply_secrets_manager_config
|
||||
apply_secrets_manager_config()
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
from pr_agent.log import get_logger
|
||||
get_logger().debug(f"AWS Secrets Manager initialization failed, falling back to environment variables: {e}")
|
||||
except:
|
||||
# Fail completely silently if log module is not available
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
middleware = [Middleware(RawContextMiddleware)]
|
||||
app = FastAPI(middleware=middleware)
|
||||
app.include_router(router)
|
||||
|
||||
handler = Mangum(app, lifespan="off")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def lambda_handler(event, context):
|
||||
return handler(event, context)
|
@ -234,9 +234,6 @@ async def gitlab_webhook(background_tasks: BackgroundTasks, request: Request):
|
||||
get_logger().info(f"Skipping draft MR: {url}")
|
||||
return JSONResponse(status_code=status.HTTP_200_OK, content=jsonable_encoder({"message": "success"}))
|
||||
|
||||
# Apply repo settings before checking push commands or handle_push_trigger
|
||||
apply_repo_settings(url)
|
||||
|
||||
commands_on_push = get_settings().get(f"gitlab.push_commands", {})
|
||||
handle_push_trigger = get_settings().get(f"gitlab.handle_push_trigger", False)
|
||||
if not commands_on_push or not handle_push_trigger:
|
||||
@ -285,8 +282,8 @@ def handle_ask_line(body, data):
|
||||
question = body.replace('/ask', '').strip()
|
||||
path = data['object_attributes']['position']['new_path']
|
||||
side = 'RIGHT' # if line_range_['start']['type'] == 'new' else 'LEFT'
|
||||
_id = data['object_attributes']["discussion_id"]
|
||||
get_logger().info("Handling line ")
|
||||
comment_id = data['object_attributes']["discussion_id"]
|
||||
get_logger().info("Handling line comment")
|
||||
body = f"/ask_line --line_start={start_line} --line_end={end_line} --side={side} --file_name={path} --comment_id={comment_id} {question}"
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
get_logger().error(f"Failed to handle ask line comment: {e}")
|
||||
|
@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ the tool will replace every marker of the form `pr_agent:marker_name` in the PR
|
||||
- `type`: the PR type.
|
||||
- `summary`: the PR summary.
|
||||
- `walkthrough`: the PR walkthrough.
|
||||
- `diagram`: the PR sequence diagram (if enabled).
|
||||
|
||||
Note that when markers are enabled, if the original PR description does not contain any markers, the tool will not alter the description at all.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -23,5 +23,5 @@ app.include_router(router)
|
||||
handler = Mangum(app, lifespan="off")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def lambda_handler(event, context):
|
||||
return handler(event, context)
|
||||
def serverless(event, context):
|
||||
return handler(event, context)
|
@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ In addition to evaluating the suggestion correctness and importance, another sub
|
||||
|
||||
Examine each suggestion meticulously, assessing its quality, relevance, and accuracy within the context of PR. Keep in mind that the suggestions may vary in their correctness, accuracy and impact.
|
||||
Consider the following components of each suggestion:
|
||||
1. 'one_sentence_summary' - A one-liner summary of the suggestion's purpose
|
||||
1. 'one_sentence_summary' - A one-liner summary summary of the suggestion's purpose
|
||||
2. 'suggestion_content' - The suggestion content, explaining the proposed modification
|
||||
3. 'existing_code' - a code snippet from a __new hunk__ section in the PR code diff that the suggestion addresses
|
||||
4. 'improved_code' - a code snippet demonstrating how the 'existing_code' should be after the suggestion is applied
|
||||
|
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
|
||||
# models
|
||||
model="o4-mini"
|
||||
fallback_models=["gpt-4.1"]
|
||||
#model_reasoning="o4-mini" # dedicated reasoning model for self-reflection
|
||||
#model_reasoning="o4-mini" # dedictated reasoning model for self-reflection
|
||||
#model_weak="gpt-4o" # optional, a weaker model to use for some easier tasks
|
||||
# CLI
|
||||
git_provider="github"
|
||||
@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ ignore_pr_source_branches = [] # a list of regular expressions of source branche
|
||||
ignore_pr_labels = [] # labels to ignore from PR agent when an PR is created
|
||||
ignore_pr_authors = [] # authors to ignore from PR agent when an PR is created
|
||||
ignore_repositories = [] # a list of regular expressions of repository full names (e.g. "org/repo") to ignore from PR agent processing
|
||||
ignore_language_framework = [] # a list of code-generation languages or frameworks (e.g. 'protobuf', 'go_gen') whose auto-generated source files will be excluded from analysis
|
||||
#
|
||||
is_auto_command = false # will be auto-set to true if the command is triggered by an automation
|
||||
enable_ai_metadata = false # will enable adding ai metadata
|
||||
@ -79,7 +78,6 @@ require_tests_review=true
|
||||
require_estimate_effort_to_review=true
|
||||
require_can_be_split_review=false
|
||||
require_security_review=true
|
||||
require_todo_scan=false
|
||||
require_ticket_analysis_review=true
|
||||
# general options
|
||||
publish_output_no_suggestions=true # Set to "false" if you only need the reviewer's remarks (not labels, not "security audit", etc.) and want to avoid noisy "No major issues detected" comments.
|
||||
@ -107,7 +105,7 @@ enable_pr_type=true
|
||||
final_update_message = true
|
||||
enable_help_text=false
|
||||
enable_help_comment=true
|
||||
enable_pr_diagram=true # adds a section with a diagram of the PR changes
|
||||
enable_pr_diagram=false # adds a section with a diagram of the PR changes
|
||||
# describe as comment
|
||||
publish_description_as_comment=false
|
||||
publish_description_as_comment_persistent=true
|
||||
|
@ -1,42 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[generated_code]
|
||||
|
||||
# Protocol Buffers
|
||||
protobuf = [
|
||||
"**/*.pb.go",
|
||||
"**/*.pb.cc",
|
||||
"**/*_pb2.py",
|
||||
"**/*.pb.swift",
|
||||
"**/*.pb.rb",
|
||||
"**/*.pb.php",
|
||||
"**/*.pb.h"
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
# OpenAPI / Swagger stubs
|
||||
openapi = [
|
||||
"**/__generated__/**",
|
||||
"**/openapi_client/**",
|
||||
"**/openapi_server/**"
|
||||
]
|
||||
swagger = [
|
||||
"**/swagger.json",
|
||||
"**/swagger.yaml"
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
# GraphQL codegen
|
||||
graphql = [
|
||||
"**/*.graphql.ts",
|
||||
"**/*.generated.ts",
|
||||
"**/*.graphql.js"
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
# RPC / gRPC Generators
|
||||
grpc_python = ["**/*_grpc.py"]
|
||||
grpc_java = ["**/*Grpc.java"]
|
||||
grpc_csharp = ["**/*Grpc.cs"]
|
||||
grpc_typescript = ["**/*_grpc.ts", "**/*_grpc.js"]
|
||||
|
||||
# Go code generators
|
||||
go_gen = [
|
||||
"**/*_gen.go",
|
||||
"**/*generated.go"
|
||||
]
|
@ -1,12 +1,11 @@
|
||||
[pr_description_prompt]
|
||||
system="""You are PR-Reviewer, a language model designed to review a Git Pull Request (PR).
|
||||
Your task is to provide a full description for the PR content: type, description, title, and files walkthrough.
|
||||
Your task is to provide a full description for the PR content - type, description, title and files walkthrough.
|
||||
- Focus on the new PR code (lines starting with '+' in the 'PR Git Diff' section).
|
||||
- Keep in mind that the 'Previous title', 'Previous description' and 'Commit messages' sections may be partial, simplistic, non-informative or out of date. Hence, compare them to the PR diff code, and use them only as a reference.
|
||||
- The generated title and description should prioritize the most significant changes.
|
||||
- If needed, each YAML output should be in block scalar indicator ('|')
|
||||
- When quoting variables, names or file paths from the code, use backticks (`) instead of single quote (').
|
||||
- When needed, use '- ' as bullets
|
||||
|
||||
{%- if extra_instructions %}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -48,7 +47,7 @@ class PRDescription(BaseModel):
|
||||
description: str = Field(description="summarize the PR changes in up to four bullet points, each up to 8 words. For large PRs, add sub-bullets if needed. Order bullets by importance, with each bullet highlighting a key change group.")
|
||||
title: str = Field(description="a concise and descriptive title that captures the PR's main theme")
|
||||
{%- if enable_pr_diagram %}
|
||||
changes_diagram: str = Field(description="a horizontal diagram that represents the main PR changes, in the format of a valid mermaid LR flowchart. The diagram should be concise and easy to read. Leave empty if no diagram is relevant. To create robust Mermaid diagrams, follow this two-step process: (1) Declare the nodes: nodeID[\"node description\"]. (2) Then define the links: nodeID1 -- \"link text\" --> nodeID2. Node description must always be surrounded with quotation marks.")
|
||||
changes_diagram: str = Field(description="a horizontal diagram that represents the main PR changes, in the format of a valid mermaid LR flowchart. The diagram should be concise and easy to read. Leave empty if no diagram is relevant. To create robust Mermaid diagrams, follow this two-step process: (1) Declare the nodes: nodeID["node description"]. (2) Then define the links: nodeID1 -- "link text" --> nodeID2 ")
|
||||
{%- endif %}
|
||||
{%- if enable_semantic_files_types %}
|
||||
pr_files: List[FileDescription] = Field(max_items=20, description="a list of all the files that were changed in the PR, and summary of their changes. Each file must be analyzed regardless of change size.")
|
||||
@ -182,4 +181,4 @@ pr_files:
|
||||
|
||||
Response (should be a valid YAML, and nothing else):
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
"""
|
||||
"""
|
@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
|
||||
[pr_help_prompts]
|
||||
system="""You are Doc-helper, a language models designed to answer questions about a documentation website for an open-soure project called "PR-Agent" (recently renamed to "Qodo Merge").
|
||||
You will receive a question, and the full documentation website content.
|
||||
You will recieve a question, and the full documentation website content.
|
||||
Your goal is to provide the best answer to the question using the documentation provided.
|
||||
|
||||
Additional instructions:
|
||||
- Try to be short and concise in your answers. Try to give examples if needed.
|
||||
- The main tools of PR-Agent are 'describe', 'review', 'improve'. If there is ambiguity to which tool the user is referring to, prioritize snippets of these tools over others.
|
||||
- If the question has ambiguity and can relate to different tools or platforms, provide the best answer possible based on what is available, but also state in your answer what additional information would be needed to give a more accurate answer.
|
||||
- If the question has ambiguity and can relate to different tools or platfroms, provide the best answer possible based on what is available, but also state in your answer what additional information would be needed to give a more accurate answer.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The output must be a YAML object equivalent to type $DocHelper, according to the following Pydantic definitions:
|
||||
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
||||
system="""You are PR-Reviewer, a language model designed to review a Git Pull Request (PR).
|
||||
Given the PR Info and the PR Git Diff, generate 3 short questions about the PR code for the PR author.
|
||||
The goal of the questions is to help the language model understand the PR better, so the questions should be insightful, informative, non-trivial, and relevant to the PR.
|
||||
You should prefer asking yes/no questions, or multiple choice questions. Also add at least one open-ended question, but make sure they are not too difficult, and can be answered in a sentence or two.
|
||||
You should prefer asking yes\\no questions, or multiple choice questions. Also add at least one open-ended question, but make sure they are not too difficult, and can be answered in a sentence or two.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Example output:
|
||||
|
@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ __new hunk__
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
- In the format above, the diff is organized into separate '__new hunk__' and '__old hunk__' sections for each code chunk. '__new hunk__' contains the updated code, while '__old hunk__' shows the removed code. If no code was removed in a specific chunk, the __old hunk__ section will be omitted.
|
||||
- We also added line numbers for the '__new hunk__' code, to help you refer to the code lines in your suggestions. These line numbers are not part of the actual code, and should only be used for reference.
|
||||
- We also added line numbers for the '__new hunk__' code, to help you refer to the code lines in your suggestions. These line numbers are not part of the actual code, and should only used for reference.
|
||||
- Code lines are prefixed with symbols ('+', '-', ' '). The '+' symbol indicates new code added in the PR, the '-' symbol indicates code removed in the PR, and the ' ' symbol indicates unchanged code. \
|
||||
The review should address new code added in the PR code diff (lines starting with '+').
|
||||
The review should address new code added in the PR code diff (lines starting with '+')
|
||||
{%- if is_ai_metadata %}
|
||||
- If available, an AI-generated summary will appear and provide a high-level overview of the file changes. Note that this summary may not be fully accurate or complete.
|
||||
{%- endif %}
|
||||
@ -72,13 +72,6 @@ class KeyIssuesComponentLink(BaseModel):
|
||||
start_line: int = Field(description="The start line that corresponds to this issue in the relevant file")
|
||||
end_line: int = Field(description="The end line that corresponds to this issue in the relevant file")
|
||||
|
||||
{%- if require_todo_scan %}
|
||||
class TodoSection(BaseModel):
|
||||
relevant_file: str = Field(description="The full path of the file containing the TODO comment")
|
||||
line_number: int = Field(description="The line number where the TODO comment starts")
|
||||
content: str = Field(description="The content of the TODO comment. Only include actual TODO comments within code comments (e.g., comments starting with '#', '//', '/*', '<!--', ...). Remove leading 'TODO' prefixes. If more than 10 words, summarize the TODO comment to a single short sentence up to 10 words.")
|
||||
{%- endif %}
|
||||
|
||||
{%- if related_tickets %}
|
||||
|
||||
class TicketCompliance(BaseModel):
|
||||
@ -100,17 +93,14 @@ class Review(BaseModel):
|
||||
score: str = Field(description="Rate this PR on a scale of 0-100 (inclusive), where 0 means the worst possible PR code, and 100 means PR code of the highest quality, without any bugs or performance issues, that is ready to be merged immediately and run in production at scale.")
|
||||
{%- endif %}
|
||||
{%- if require_tests %}
|
||||
relevant_tests: str = Field(description="yes/no question: does this PR have relevant tests added or updated ?")
|
||||
relevant_tests: str = Field(description="yes\\no question: does this PR have relevant tests added or updated ?")
|
||||
{%- endif %}
|
||||
{%- if question_str %}
|
||||
insights_from_user_answers: str = Field(description="shortly summarize the insights you gained from the user's answers to the questions")
|
||||
{%- endif %}
|
||||
key_issues_to_review: List[KeyIssuesComponentLink] = Field("A short and diverse list (0-{{ num_max_findings }} issues) of high-priority bugs, problems or performance concerns introduced in the PR code, which the PR reviewer should further focus on and validate during the review process.")
|
||||
{%- if require_security_review %}
|
||||
security_concerns: str = Field(description="Does this PR code introduce vulnerabilities such as exposure of sensitive information (e.g., API keys, secrets, passwords), or security concerns like SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, and others ? Answer 'No' (without explaining why) if there are no possible issues. If there are security concerns or issues, start your answer with a short header, such as: 'Sensitive information exposure: ...', 'SQL injection: ...', etc. Explain your answer. Be specific and give examples if possible")
|
||||
{%- endif %}
|
||||
{%- if require_todo_scan %}
|
||||
todo_sections: Union[List[TodoSection], str] = Field(description="A list of TODO comments found in the PR code. Return 'No' (as a string) if there are no TODO comments in the PR")
|
||||
security_concerns: str = Field(description="Does this PR code introduce possible vulnerabilities such as exposure of sensitive information (e.g., API keys, secrets, passwords), or security concerns like SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, and others ? Answer 'No' (without explaining why) if there are no possible issues. If there are security concerns or issues, start your answer with a short header, such as: 'Sensitive information exposure: ...', 'SQL injection: ...' etc. Explain your answer. Be specific and give examples if possible")
|
||||
{%- endif %}
|
||||
{%- if require_can_be_split_review %}
|
||||
can_be_split: List[SubPR] = Field(min_items=0, max_items=3, description="Can this PR, which contains {{ num_pr_files }} changed files in total, be divided into smaller sub-PRs with distinct tasks that can be reviewed and merged independently, regardless of the order ? Make sure that the sub-PRs are indeed independent, with no code dependencies between them, and that each sub-PR represent a meaningful independent task. Output an empty list if the PR code does not need to be split.")
|
||||
@ -158,10 +148,6 @@ review:
|
||||
- ...
|
||||
security_concerns: |
|
||||
No
|
||||
{%- if require_todo_scan %}
|
||||
todo_sections: |
|
||||
No
|
||||
{%- endif %}
|
||||
{%- if require_can_be_split_review %}
|
||||
can_be_split:
|
||||
- relevant_files:
|
||||
@ -196,13 +182,6 @@ Ticket Description:
|
||||
{{ ticket.body }}
|
||||
#####
|
||||
{%- endif %}
|
||||
|
||||
{%- if ticket.requirements %}
|
||||
Ticket Requirements:
|
||||
#####
|
||||
{{ ticket.requirements }}
|
||||
#####
|
||||
{%- endif %}
|
||||
=====
|
||||
{% endfor %}
|
||||
{%- endif %}
|
||||
@ -287,10 +266,6 @@ review:
|
||||
- ...
|
||||
security_concerns: |
|
||||
No
|
||||
{%- if require_todo_scan %}
|
||||
todo_sections: |
|
||||
No
|
||||
{%- endif %}
|
||||
{%- if require_can_be_split_review %}
|
||||
can_be_split:
|
||||
- relevant_files:
|
||||
|
@ -614,13 +614,11 @@ class PRCodeSuggestions:
|
||||
break
|
||||
if original_initial_line:
|
||||
suggested_initial_line = new_code_snippet.splitlines()[0]
|
||||
original_initial_spaces = len(original_initial_line) - len(original_initial_line.lstrip()) # lstrip works both for spaces and tabs
|
||||
original_initial_spaces = len(original_initial_line) - len(original_initial_line.lstrip())
|
||||
suggested_initial_spaces = len(suggested_initial_line) - len(suggested_initial_line.lstrip())
|
||||
delta_spaces = original_initial_spaces - suggested_initial_spaces
|
||||
if delta_spaces > 0:
|
||||
# Detect indentation character from original line
|
||||
indent_char = '\t' if original_initial_line.startswith('\t') else ' '
|
||||
new_code_snippet = textwrap.indent(new_code_snippet, delta_spaces * indent_char).rstrip('\n')
|
||||
new_code_snippet = textwrap.indent(new_code_snippet, delta_spaces * " ").rstrip('\n')
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
get_logger().error(f"Error when dedenting code snippet for file {relevant_file}, error: {e}")
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ class PRDescription:
|
||||
|
||||
# Initialize the variables dictionary
|
||||
self.COLLAPSIBLE_FILE_LIST_THRESHOLD = get_settings().pr_description.get("collapsible_file_list_threshold", 8)
|
||||
enable_pr_diagram = get_settings().pr_description.get("enable_pr_diagram", False) and self.git_provider.is_supported("gfm_markdown") # github and gitlab support gfm_markdown
|
||||
self.vars = {
|
||||
"title": self.git_provider.pr.title,
|
||||
"branch": self.git_provider.get_pr_branch(),
|
||||
@ -74,7 +73,7 @@ class PRDescription:
|
||||
"related_tickets": "",
|
||||
"include_file_summary_changes": len(self.git_provider.get_diff_files()) <= self.COLLAPSIBLE_FILE_LIST_THRESHOLD,
|
||||
"duplicate_prompt_examples": get_settings().config.get("duplicate_prompt_examples", False),
|
||||
"enable_pr_diagram": enable_pr_diagram,
|
||||
"enable_pr_diagram": get_settings().pr_description.get("enable_pr_diagram", False),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
self.user_description = self.git_provider.get_user_description()
|
||||
@ -538,11 +537,6 @@ class PRDescription:
|
||||
get_logger().error(f"Failing to process walkthrough {self.pr_id}: {e}")
|
||||
body = body.replace('pr_agent:walkthrough', "")
|
||||
|
||||
# Add support for pr_agent:diagram marker (plain and HTML comment formats)
|
||||
ai_diagram = self.data.get('changes_diagram')
|
||||
if ai_diagram:
|
||||
body = re.sub(r'<!--\s*pr_agent:diagram\s*-->|pr_agent:diagram', ai_diagram, body)
|
||||
|
||||
return title, body, walkthrough_gfm, pr_file_changes
|
||||
|
||||
def _prepare_pr_answer(self) -> Tuple[str, str, str, List[dict]]:
|
||||
|
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ from pr_agent.servers.help import HelpMessage
|
||||
|
||||
#Common code that can be called from similar tools:
|
||||
def modify_answer_section(ai_response: str) -> str | None:
|
||||
# Gets the model's answer and relevant sources section, replacing the heading of the answer section with:
|
||||
# Gets the model's answer and relevant sources section, repacing the heading of the answer section with:
|
||||
# :bulb: Auto-generated documentation-based answer:
|
||||
"""
|
||||
For example: The following input:
|
||||
|
@ -87,7 +87,6 @@ class PRReviewer:
|
||||
"require_estimate_effort_to_review": get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_estimate_effort_to_review,
|
||||
'require_can_be_split_review': get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_can_be_split_review,
|
||||
'require_security_review': get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_security_review,
|
||||
'require_todo_scan': get_settings().pr_reviewer.get("require_todo_scan", False),
|
||||
'question_str': question_str,
|
||||
'answer_str': answer_str,
|
||||
"extra_instructions": get_settings().pr_reviewer.extra_instructions,
|
||||
|
@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ import traceback
|
||||
|
||||
from pr_agent.config_loader import get_settings
|
||||
from pr_agent.git_providers import GithubProvider
|
||||
from pr_agent.git_providers import AzureDevopsProvider
|
||||
from pr_agent.log import get_logger
|
||||
|
||||
# Compile the regex pattern once, outside the function
|
||||
@ -132,32 +131,6 @@ async def extract_tickets(git_provider):
|
||||
|
||||
return tickets_content
|
||||
|
||||
elif isinstance(git_provider, AzureDevopsProvider):
|
||||
tickets_info = git_provider.get_linked_work_items()
|
||||
tickets_content = []
|
||||
for ticket in tickets_info:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
ticket_body_str = ticket.get("body", "")
|
||||
if len(ticket_body_str) > MAX_TICKET_CHARACTERS:
|
||||
ticket_body_str = ticket_body_str[:MAX_TICKET_CHARACTERS] + "..."
|
||||
|
||||
tickets_content.append(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"ticket_id": ticket.get("id"),
|
||||
"ticket_url": ticket.get("url"),
|
||||
"title": ticket.get("title"),
|
||||
"body": ticket_body_str,
|
||||
"requirements": ticket.get("acceptance_criteria", ""),
|
||||
"labels": ", ".join(ticket.get("labels", [])),
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
get_logger().error(
|
||||
f"Error processing Azure DevOps ticket: {e}",
|
||||
artifact={"traceback": traceback.format_exc()},
|
||||
)
|
||||
return tickets_content
|
||||
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
get_logger().error(f"Error extracting tickets error= {e}",
|
||||
artifact={"traceback": traceback.format_exc()})
|
||||
|
@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
|
||||
[build-system]
|
||||
requires = ["setuptools>=61.0", "wheel"]
|
||||
requires = ["setuptools>=61.0"]
|
||||
build-backend = "setuptools.build_meta"
|
||||
|
||||
[project]
|
||||
name = "pr-agent"
|
||||
version = "0.3.0"
|
||||
version = "0.2.7"
|
||||
|
||||
authors = [{ name = "QodoAI", email = "tal.r@qodo.ai" }]
|
||||
|
||||
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ description = "QodoAI PR-Agent aims to help efficiently review and handle pull r
|
||||
readme = "README.md"
|
||||
requires-python = ">=3.12"
|
||||
keywords = ["AI", "Agents", "Pull Request", "Automation", "Code Review"]
|
||||
license = { file = "LICENSE" }
|
||||
license = "Apache-2.0"
|
||||
|
||||
classifiers = [
|
||||
"Intended Audience :: Developers",
|
||||
@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ dependencies = { file = ["requirements.txt"] }
|
||||
|
||||
[tool.setuptools]
|
||||
include-package-data = true
|
||||
license-files = ["LICENSE"]
|
||||
|
||||
[tool.setuptools.packages.find]
|
||||
where = ["."]
|
||||
|
@ -1,92 +0,0 @@
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
from pr_agent.servers.github_app import handle_new_pr_opened
|
||||
from pr_agent.tools.pr_add_docs import PRAddDocs
|
||||
from pr_agent.agent.pr_agent import PRAgent
|
||||
from pr_agent.config_loader import get_settings
|
||||
from pr_agent.identity_providers.identity_provider import Eligibility
|
||||
from pr_agent.identity_providers import get_identity_provider
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||||
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
|
||||
"action,draft,state,should_run",
|
||||
[
|
||||
("opened", False, "open", True),
|
||||
("edited", False, "open", False),
|
||||
("opened", True, "open", False),
|
||||
("opened", False, "closed", False),
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
async def test_add_docs_trigger(monkeypatch, action, draft, state, should_run):
|
||||
# Mock settings to enable the "/add_docs" auto-command on PR opened
|
||||
settings = get_settings()
|
||||
settings.github_app.pr_commands = ["/add_docs"]
|
||||
settings.github_app.handle_pr_actions = ["opened"]
|
||||
|
||||
# Define a FakeGitProvider for both apply_repo_settings and PRAddDocs
|
||||
class FakeGitProvider:
|
||||
def __init__(self, pr_url, *args, **kwargs):
|
||||
self.pr = type("pr", (), {"title": "Test PR"})()
|
||||
self.get_pr_branch = lambda: "test-branch"
|
||||
self.get_pr_description = lambda: "desc"
|
||||
self.get_languages = lambda: ["Python"]
|
||||
self.get_files = lambda: []
|
||||
self.get_commit_messages = lambda: "msg"
|
||||
self.publish_comment = lambda *args, **kwargs: None
|
||||
self.remove_initial_comment = lambda: None
|
||||
self.publish_code_suggestions = lambda suggestions: True
|
||||
self.diff_files = []
|
||||
self.get_repo_settings = lambda: {}
|
||||
|
||||
# Patch Git provider lookups
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(
|
||||
"pr_agent.git_providers.utils.get_git_provider_with_context",
|
||||
lambda pr_url: FakeGitProvider(pr_url),
|
||||
)
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(
|
||||
"pr_agent.tools.pr_add_docs.get_git_provider",
|
||||
lambda: FakeGitProvider,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Ensure identity provider always eligible
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(
|
||||
get_identity_provider().__class__,
|
||||
"verify_eligibility",
|
||||
lambda *args, **kwargs: Eligibility.ELIGIBLE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Spy on PRAddDocs.run()
|
||||
ran = {"flag": False}
|
||||
|
||||
async def fake_run(self):
|
||||
ran["flag"] = True
|
||||
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(PRAddDocs, "run", fake_run)
|
||||
|
||||
# Build minimal PR payload
|
||||
body = {
|
||||
"action": action,
|
||||
"pull_request": {
|
||||
"url": "https://example.com/fake/pr",
|
||||
"state": state,
|
||||
"draft": draft,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
log_context = {}
|
||||
|
||||
# Invoke the PR-open handler
|
||||
agent = PRAgent()
|
||||
await handle_new_pr_opened(
|
||||
body=body,
|
||||
event="pull_request",
|
||||
sender="tester",
|
||||
sender_id="123",
|
||||
action=action,
|
||||
log_context=log_context,
|
||||
agent=agent,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
assert ran["flag"] is should_run, (
|
||||
f"Expected run() to be {'called' if should_run else 'skipped'}"
|
||||
f" for action={action!r}, draft={draft}, state={state!r}"
|
||||
)
|
@ -80,53 +80,3 @@ class TestIgnoreFilter:
|
||||
|
||||
filtered_files = filter_ignored(files)
|
||||
assert filtered_files == expected, f"Expected {[file.filename for file in expected]}, but got {[file.filename for file in filtered_files]}."
|
||||
|
||||
def test_language_framework_ignores(self, monkeypatch):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Test files are ignored based on language/framework mapping (e.g., protobuf).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(global_settings.config, 'ignore_language_framework', ['protobuf', 'go_gen'])
|
||||
|
||||
files = [
|
||||
type('', (object,), {'filename': 'main.go'})(),
|
||||
type('', (object,), {'filename': 'dir1/service.pb.go'})(),
|
||||
type('', (object,), {'filename': 'dir1/dir/data_pb2.py'})(),
|
||||
type('', (object,), {'filename': 'file.py'})(),
|
||||
type('', (object,), {'filename': 'dir2/file_gen.go'})(),
|
||||
type('', (object,), {'filename': 'file.generated.go'})()
|
||||
]
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
files[0],
|
||||
files[3]
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
filtered = filter_ignored(files)
|
||||
assert filtered == expected, (
|
||||
f"Expected {[f.filename for f in expected]}, "
|
||||
f"but got {[f.filename for f in filtered]}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_skip_invalid_ignore_language_framework(self, monkeypatch):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Test skipping of generated code filtering when ignore_language_framework is not a list
|
||||
"""
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(global_settings.config, 'ignore_language_framework', 'protobuf')
|
||||
|
||||
files = [
|
||||
type('', (object,), {'filename': 'main.go'})(),
|
||||
type('', (object,), {'filename': 'file.py'})(),
|
||||
type('', (object,), {'filename': 'dir1/service.pb.go'})(),
|
||||
type('', (object,), {'filename': 'file_pb2.py'})()
|
||||
]
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
files[0],
|
||||
files[1],
|
||||
files[2],
|
||||
files[3]
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
filtered = filter_ignored(files)
|
||||
assert filtered == expected, (
|
||||
f"Expected {[f.filename for f in expected]}, "
|
||||
f"but got {[f.filename for f in filtered]}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user