xiaxinhang/pr-agent
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/qodo-ai/pr-agent.git synced 2025-07-15 10:10:38 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update PR review prompts and terminology for clarity and consistency

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
mrT23
2024-06-09 14:29:32 +03:00
parent f4c9d23084
commit 9c8bc6c86a
6 changed files with 21 additions and 15 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml
View File

@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ require_security_review=true
require_soc2_ticket=false
soc2_ticket_prompt="Does the PR description include a link to ticket in a project management system (e.g., Jira, Asana, Trello, etc.) ?"
# general options
num_code_suggestions=4
num_code_suggestions=0
inline_code_comments = false
ask_and_reflect=false
#automatic_review=true

8
pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml
View File

@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ class SubPR(BaseModel):
class Review(BaseModel):
{%- if require_estimate_effort_to_review %}
estimated_effort_to_review_[1-5]: str = Field(description="Estimate, on a scale of 1-5 (inclusive), the time and effort required to review this PR by an experienced and knowledgeable developer. 1 means short and easy review , 5 means long and hard review. Take into account the size, complexity, quality, and the needed changes of the PR code diff. Explain your answer in a short and concise manner.")
estimated_effort_to_review_[1-5]: int = Field(description="Estimate, on a scale of 1-5 (inclusive), the time and effort required to review this PR by an experienced and knowledgeable developer. 1 means short and easy review , 5 means long and hard review. Take into account the size, complexity, quality, and the needed changes of the PR code diff.")
{%- endif %}
{%- if require_score %}
score: str = Field(description="Rate this PR on a scale of 0-100 (inclusive), where 0 means the worst possible PR code, and 100 means PR code of the highest quality, without any bugs or performance issues, that is ready to be merged immediately and run in production at scale.")
@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ class Review(BaseModel):
{%- if question_str %}
insights_from_user_answers: str = Field(description="shortly summarize the insights you gained from the user's answers to the questions")
{%- endif %}
possible_issues: str = Field(description="Does this PR code introduce clear issues, bugs, or major performance concerns? If there are no apparent issues, respond with 'No'. If there are any issues, describe them briefly. Use bullet points if more than one issue. Be specific, and provide examples if possible. Start each bullet point with a short specific header, such as: "- Possible Bug: ...", etc.")
key_issues_to_review: str = Field(description="Does this PR code introduce issues, bugs, or major performance concerns, which the PR reviewer should further investigate ? If there are no apparent issues, respond with 'No'. If there are any issues, describe them briefly. Use bullet points if more than one issue. Be specific, and provide examples if possible. Start each bullet point with a short specific header, such as: "- Possible Bug: ...", etc.")
{%- if require_security_review %}
security_concerns: str = Field(description="does this PR code introduce possible vulnerabilities such as exposure of sensitive information (e.g., API keys, secrets, passwords), or security concerns like SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, and others ? Answer 'No' if there are no possible issues. If there are security concerns or issues, start your answer with a short header, such as: 'Sensitive information exposure: ...', 'SQL injection: ...' etc. Explain your answer. Be specific and give examples if possible")
{%- endif %}
@ -101,14 +101,14 @@ Example output:
review:
{%- if require_estimate_effort_to_review %}
estimated_effort_to_review_[1-5]: |
3, because ...
3
{%- endif %}
{%- if require_score %}
score: 89
{%- endif %}
relevant_tests: |
No
possible_issues: |
key_issues_to_review: |
No
security_concerns: |
No