resolve conflicts after merging main

README.md

@@ -182,10 +182,10 @@ Here is a quick overview of the different sub-tools of PR Reviewer:
   - PR type classification
   - Is the PR covered by relevant tests
   - Is the PR minimal and focused
+  - Are there security concerns
 - PR Feedback
   - General PR suggestions
   - Code suggestions
-  - Security concerns
 
 This is how a typical output of the PR Reviewer looks like:
 
@@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ This is how a typical output of the PR Reviewer looks like:
 - 📌 **Type of PR:** Enhancement
 - 🧪 **Relevant tests added:** No
 - ✨ **Minimal and focused:** Yes, the PR is focused on adding two new handlers for language extension and token counting.
+- 🔒 **Security concerns:** No, the PR does not introduce possible security concerns or issues.
 
 #### PR Feedback
 
@@ -205,17 +206,13 @@ This is how a typical output of the PR Reviewer looks like:
 
 - 🤖 **Code suggestions:**
 
-- **suggestion 1:**
+  - **relevant file:** pr_agent/algo/language_handler.py
+
+    **suggestion content:** Consider using a set instead of a list for 'bad_extensions' as checking membership in a set is faster than in a list. [medium]
 
   - **relevant file:** pr_agent/algo/language_handler.py
-  - **suggestion content:** Consider using a set instead of a list for 'bad_extensions' as checking membership in a set is faster than in a list. [medium]
 
-- **suggestion 2:**
-
-  - **relevant file:** pr_agent/algo/language_handler.py
-  - **suggestion content:** In the 'filter_bad_extensions' function, you are splitting the filename on '.' and taking the last element to get the extension. This might not work as expected if the filename contains multiple '.' characters. Consider using 'os.path.splitext' to get the file extension more reliably. [important]
-
-- 🔒 **Security concerns:** No, the PR does not introduce possible security concerns or issues.
+    **suggestion content:** In the 'filter_bad_extensions' function, you are splitting the filename on '.' and taking the last element to get the extension. This might not work as expected if the filename contains multiple '.' characters. Consider using 'os.path.splitext' to get the file extension more reliably. [important]
 
 ---
 
@@ -269,31 +266,27 @@ This is a comparison of the regular and extended code suggestions modes:
 
 ---
 
-Example for regular suggestion:
-
-- **suggestion 1:**
-  - **relevant file:** sql.py
-  - **suggestion content:** Remove hardcoded sensitive information like username and password. Use environment variables or a secure method to store these values. [important]
+- **relevant file:** sql.py
+- **suggestion content:** Remove hardcoded sensitive information like username and password. Use environment variables or a secure method to store these values. [important]
 
 ---
 
 Example for extended suggestion:
 
-- **suggestion 1:**
-  - **relevant file:** sql.py
-  - **suggestion content:** Remove hardcoded sensitive information (username and password) [important]
-  - **why:** Hardcoding sensitive information is a security risk. It's better to use environment variables or a secure way to store these values.
-  - **code example:**
-    - **before code:**
-      ```
-      user = "root",
-      password = "Mysql@123",
-      ```
-    - **after code:**
-      ```
-      user = os.getenv('DB_USER'),
-      password = os.getenv('DB_PASSWORD'),
-      ```
+- **relevant file:** sql.py
+- **suggestion content:** Remove hardcoded sensitive information (username and password) [important]
+- **why:** Hardcoding sensitive information is a security risk. It's better to use environment variables or a secure way to store these values.
+- **code example:**
+  - **before code:**
+    ```
+    user = "root",
+    password = "Mysql@123",
+    ```
+  - **after code:**
+    ```
+    user = os.getenv('DB_USER'),
+    password = os.getenv('DB_PASSWORD'),
+    ```
 
 ---