mirror of
https://github.com/qodo-ai/pr-agent.git
synced 2025-07-03 04:10:49 +08:00
Merge pull request #730 from Codium-ai/tr/issue_header
Enhance markdown formatting fo issues
This commit is contained in:
@ -28,6 +28,25 @@ def get_setting(key: str) -> Any:
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
return global_settings.get(key, None)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def emphasize_header(text: str) -> str:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
# Finding the position of the first occurrence of ": "
|
||||
colon_position = text.find(": ")
|
||||
|
||||
# Splitting the string and wrapping the first part in <strong> tags
|
||||
if colon_position != -1:
|
||||
# Everything before the colon (inclusive) is wrapped in <strong> tags
|
||||
transformed_string = "<strong>" + text[:colon_position + 1] + "</strong>" + text[colon_position + 1:]
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# If there's no ": ", return the original string
|
||||
transformed_string = text
|
||||
|
||||
return transformed_string
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
get_logger().exception(f"Failed to emphasize header: {e}")
|
||||
return text
|
||||
|
||||
def convert_to_markdown(output_data: dict, gfm_supported: bool=True) -> str:
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Convert a dictionary of data into markdown format.
|
||||
@ -64,7 +83,10 @@ def convert_to_markdown(output_data: dict, gfm_supported: bool=True) -> str:
|
||||
if gfm_supported:
|
||||
if 'Estimated effort to review' in key_nice:
|
||||
key_nice = 'Estimated effort to review [1-5]'
|
||||
if 'possible issues' in key_nice.lower():
|
||||
if 'security concerns' in key_nice.lower():
|
||||
value = emphasize_header(value.strip())
|
||||
markdown_text += f"<tr><td> {emoji} <strong>{key_nice}</strong></td><td>\n\n{value}\n\n</td></tr>\n"
|
||||
elif 'possible issues' in key_nice.lower():
|
||||
value = value.strip()
|
||||
issues = value.split('\n- ')
|
||||
number_of_issues = len(issues)
|
||||
@ -72,12 +94,13 @@ def convert_to_markdown(output_data: dict, gfm_supported: bool=True) -> str:
|
||||
markdown_text += f"<tr><td rowspan={number_of_issues}> {emoji} <strong>{key_nice}</strong></td>\n"
|
||||
for i, issue in enumerate(issues):
|
||||
issue = issue.strip('-').strip()
|
||||
issue = emphasize_header(issue.strip())
|
||||
if i == 0:
|
||||
markdown_text += f"<td>\n\n{issue}</td></tr>\n"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
markdown_text += f"<tr>\n<td>\n\n{issue}</td></tr>\n"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
value = value.strip('-').strip()
|
||||
value = emphasize_header(value.strip('-').strip())
|
||||
markdown_text += f"<tr><td> {emoji} <strong>{key_nice}</strong></td><td>\n\n{value}\n\n</td></tr>\n"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
markdown_text += f"<tr><td> {emoji} <strong>{key_nice}</strong></td><td>\n\n{value}\n\n</td></tr>\n"
|
||||
|
@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ class Review(BaseModel)
|
||||
{%- if require_focused %}
|
||||
focused_pr: str = Field(description="Is this a focused PR, in the sense that all the PR code diff changes are united under a single focused theme ? If the theme is too broad, or the PR code diff changes are too scattered, then the PR is not focused. Explain your answer shortly.")
|
||||
{%- endif %}
|
||||
possible_issues: str = Field(description="Does this PR code introduce clear issues, bugs, or performance concerns? If there are no apparent issues, respond with 'No'. If there are any issues, describe them briefly. Use bullet points if more than one issue. Be specific, and provide examples if possible.")
|
||||
security_concerns: str = Field(description="does this PR code introduce possible vulnerabilities such as exposure of sensitive information (e.g., API keys, secrets, passwords), or security concerns like SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, and others ? Answer 'No' if there are no possible issues. Answer 'Yes, because ...' if there are security concerns or issues. Explain your answer. Be specific and give examples if possible")
|
||||
possible_issues: str = Field(description="Does this PR code introduce clear issues, bugs, or major performance concerns? If there are no apparent issues, respond with 'No'. If there are any issues, describe them briefly. Use bullet points if more than one issue. Be specific, and provide examples if possible. Start each bullet point with a short specific header, such as: "- Possible Bug: ...", etc.")
|
||||
security_concerns: str = Field(description="does this PR code introduce possible vulnerabilities such as exposure of sensitive information (e.g., API keys, secrets, passwords), or security concerns like SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, and others ? Answer 'No' if there are no possible issues. If there are security concerns or issues, start your answer with a short header, such as: 'Sensitive information exposure: ...', 'SQL injection: ...' etc. Explain your answer. Be specific and give examples if possible")
|
||||
{%- if num_code_suggestions > 0 %}
|
||||
|
||||
class CodeSuggestion(BaseModel)
|
||||
|
@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ class TestConvertToMarkdown:
|
||||
'suggestion': "Consider raising an exception or logging a warning when 'pr_url' attribute is not found. This can help in debugging issues related to the absence of 'pr_url' in instances where it's expected. [important]\n",
|
||||
'relevant_line': '[return ""](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent-pro/pull/102/files#diff-52d45f12b836f77ed1aef86e972e65404634ea4e2a6083fb71a9b0f9bb9e062fR199)'}]}
|
||||
|
||||
expected_output = '## PR Review\n\n<table>\n<tr>\n<tr><td> ⏱️ <strong>Estimated effort to review [1-5]</strong></td><td>\n\n1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, focusing on a single functionality addition.\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🧪 <strong>Relevant tests</strong></td><td>\n\nNo\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🔍 <strong>Possible issues</strong></td><td>\n\nNo\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🔒 <strong>Security concerns</strong></td><td>\n\nNo\n\n\n</td></tr>\n</table>\n\n\n<details><summary> <strong>Code feedback:</strong></summary>\n\n<hr><table><tr><td>relevant file</td><td>pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py\n</td></tr><tr><td>suggestion </td><td>\n\n<strong>\n\nConsider raising an exception or logging a warning when \'pr_url\' attribute is not found. This can help in debugging issues related to the absence of \'pr_url\' in instances where it\'s expected. [important]\n\n</strong>\n</td></tr><tr><td>relevant line</td><td><a href=\'https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent-pro/pull/102/files#diff-52d45f12b836f77ed1aef86e972e65404634ea4e2a6083fb71a9b0f9bb9e062fR199\'>return ""</a></td></tr></table><hr>\n\n</details>'
|
||||
expected_output = '## PR Review\n\n<table>\n<tr>\n<tr><td> ⏱️ <strong>Estimated effort to review [1-5]</strong></td><td>\n\n1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, focusing on a single functionality addition.\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🧪 <strong>Relevant tests</strong></td><td>\n\nNo\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🔍 <strong>Possible issues</strong></td><td>\n\nNo\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🔒 <strong>Security concerns</strong></td><td>\n\nNo\n\n</td></tr>\n</table>\n\n\n<details><summary> <strong>Code feedback:</strong></summary>\n\n<hr><table><tr><td>relevant file</td><td>pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py\n</td></tr><tr><td>suggestion </td><td>\n\n<strong>\n\nConsider raising an exception or logging a warning when \'pr_url\' attribute is not found. This can help in debugging issues related to the absence of \'pr_url\' in instances where it\'s expected. [important]\n\n</strong>\n</td></tr><tr><td>relevant line</td><td><a href=\'https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent-pro/pull/102/files#diff-52d45f12b836f77ed1aef86e972e65404634ea4e2a6083fb71a9b0f9bb9e062fR199\'>return ""</a></td></tr></table><hr>\n\n</details>'
|
||||
|
||||
assert convert_to_markdown(input_data).strip() == expected_output.strip()
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user