issue_header:str=Field(description="One or two word title for the the issue. For example: 'Possible Bug', 'Performance Issue', 'Code Smell', etc.")
issue_content:str=Field(description="A short and concise summary of what should be further inspected and validated during the PR review process for this issue. Don't state line numbers here")
start_line:int=Field(description="The start line that corresponds to this issue in the relevant file")
end_line:int=Field(description="The end line that corresponds to this issue in the relevant file")
ticket_url:str=Field(description="Ticket URL or ID")
ticket_requirements:str=Field(description="Repeat, in your own words, all ticket requirements, in bullet points")
fully_compliant_requirements:str=Field(description="A list, in bullet points, of which requirements are met by the PR code. Don't explain how the requirements are met, just list them shortly. Can be empty")
not_compliant_requirements:str=Field(description="A list, in bullet points, of which requirements are not met by the PR code. Don't explain how the requirements are not met, just list them shortly. Can be empty")
overall_compliance_level:str=Field(description="Overall give this PR one of these three values in relation to the ticket: 'Fully compliant', 'Partially compliant', or 'Not compliant'")
estimated_effort_to_review_[1-5]:int=Field(description="Estimate, on a scale of 1-5 (inclusive), the time and effort required to review this PR by an experienced and knowledgeable developer. 1 means short and easy review , 5 means long and hard review. Take into account the size, complexity, quality, and the needed changes of the PR code diff.")
score:str=Field(description="Rate this PR on a scale of 0-100 (inclusive), where 0 means the worst possible PR code, and 100 means PR code of the highest quality, without any bugs or performance issues, that is ready to be merged immediately and run in production at scale.")
key_issues_to_review:List[KeyIssuesComponentLink]=Field("A diverse list of bugs, issue or major performance concerns introduced in this PR, which the PR reviewer should further investigate")
security_concerns:str=Field(description="Does this PR code introduce possible vulnerabilities such as exposure of sensitive information (e.g., API keys, secrets, passwords), or security concerns like SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, and others ? Answer 'No' (without explaining why) if there are no possible issues. If there are security concerns or issues, start your answer with a short header, such as: 'Sensitive information exposure: ...', 'SQL injection: ...' etc. Explain your answer. Be specific and give examples if possible")
can_be_split:List[SubPR]=Field(min_items=0,max_items=3,description="Can this PR, which contains {{ num_pr_files }} changed files in total, be divided into smaller sub-PRs with distinct tasks that can be reviewed and merged independently, regardless of the order ? Make sure that the sub-PRs are indeed independent, with no code dependencies between them, and that each sub-PR represent a meaningful independent task. Output an empty list if the PR code does not need to be split.")
suggestion:str=Field(description="a concrete suggestion for meaningfully improving the new PR code. Also describe how, specifically, the suggestion can be applied to new PR code. Add tags with importance measure that matches each suggestion ('important' or 'medium'). Do not make suggestions for updating or adding docstrings, renaming PR title and description, or linter like.")
relevant_line:str=Field(description="a single code line taken from the relevant file, to which the suggestion applies. The code line should start with a '+'. Make sure to output the line exactly as it appears in the relevant file")
