issue_content:str=Field(description="A short and concise summary of what should be further inspected and validated during the PR review process for this issue. Do not mention line numbers in this field.")
relevant_file:str=Field(description="The file containing the TODO comment")
line_number:int=Field(description="The line number of the TODO comment")
content:str=Field(description="The content of the TODO comment. Only include items that are actual TODO comments inside code comments (e.g., lines starting with #, //, /*, <!--, etc). Remove any leading 'TODO' or similar prefix from the content, but do include lines like '# TODO' even if they result in empty content after prefix removal. Do not include TODOs that are not in comments or not prefixed appropriately.")
ticket_requirements:str=Field(description="Repeat, in your own words (in bullet points), all the requirements, sub-tasks, DoD, and acceptance criteria raised by the ticket")
fully_compliant_requirements:str=Field(description="Bullet-point list of items from the 'ticket_requirements' section above that are fulfilled by the PR code. Don't explain how the requirements are met, just list them shortly. Can be empty")
not_compliant_requirements:str=Field(description="Bullet-point list of items from the 'ticket_requirements' section above that are not fulfilled by the PR code. Don't explain how the requirements are not met, just list them shortly. Can be empty")
requires_further_human_verification:str=Field(description="Bullet-point list of items from the 'ticket_requirements' section above that cannot be assessed through code review alone, are unclear, or need further human review (e.g., browser testing, UI checks). Leave empty if all 'ticket_requirements' were marked as fully compliant or not compliant")
estimated_effort_to_review_[1-5]:int=Field(description="Estimate, on a scale of 1-5 (inclusive), the time and effort required to review this PR by an experienced and knowledgeable developer. 1 means short and easy review , 5 means long and hard review. Take into account the size, complexity, quality, and the needed changes of the PR code diff.")
score:str=Field(description="Rate this PR on a scale of 0-100 (inclusive), where 0 means the worst possible PR code, and 100 means PR code of the highest quality, without any bugs or performance issues, that is ready to be merged immediately and run in production at scale.")
key_issues_to_review:List[KeyIssuesComponentLink]=Field("A short and diverse list (0-{{ num_max_findings }} issues) of high-priority bugs, problems or performance concerns introduced in the PR code, which the PR reviewer should further focus on and validate during the review process.")
security_concerns:str=Field(description="Does this PR code introduce possible vulnerabilities such as exposure of sensitive information (e.g., API keys, secrets, passwords), or security concerns like SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, and others ? Answer 'No' (without explaining why) if there are no possible issues. If there are security concerns or issues, start your answer with a short header, such as: 'Sensitive information exposure: ...', 'SQL injection: ...' etc. Explain your answer. Be specific and give examples if possible")
can_be_split:List[SubPR]=Field(min_items=0,max_items=3,description="Can this PR, which contains {{ num_pr_files }} changed files in total, be divided into smaller sub-PRs with distinct tasks that can be reviewed and merged independently, regardless of the order ? Make sure that the sub-PRs are indeed independent, with no code dependencies between them, and that each sub-PR represent a meaningful independent task. Output an empty list if the PR code does not need to be split.")
